It should have been leaked/published in that case on friday morning, before Klopp press conference. Opportunity missed.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Liverpool pay City £1 million in "spy" settlement for hacking - biggest PL scandal
- Thread starter xzbit04
- Start date
bangkokblueballs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 511
Even at the press conferenceIt should have been leaked/published in that case on friday morning, before Klopp press conference. Opportunity missed.
r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
bronco
Well-Known Member
Hardly covered by the press or media with the exception of the times today , I just mentioned it on a guardian article about city v Watford and the post was immediately taken down by the mods ? Sounds like the truth is painful reading for a great many
Newman Noggs
Well-Known Member
Unauthorised access is an offence under the Computer Misuse Act 1990. Absent any evidence of intent to commit further offences or alter the data, it's probable we decided civil action was the way to go.
And in civil action you have to weigh up the amount offered against the risk of costs going against you. So, if Liverpool offered a million pounds and we proceeded we'd risk the court deciding that £1m was fair given no proof of financial consequences and we should have accepted.
Interesting that it has found its way into the public domain. It suggests that Liverpool weren't able to bind us to a confidentiality clause. An indication of the strength of our case.
And in civil action you have to weigh up the amount offered against the risk of costs going against you. So, if Liverpool offered a million pounds and we proceeded we'd risk the court deciding that £1m was fair given no proof of financial consequences and we should have accepted.
Interesting that it has found its way into the public domain. It suggests that Liverpool weren't able to bind us to a confidentiality clause. An indication of the strength of our case.
Hardly covered by the press or media with the exception of the times today , I just mentioned it on a guardian article about city v Watford and the post was immediately taken down by the mods ? Sounds like the truth is painful reading for a great many
There are scousers everywhere In the media doing this sort of stuff they like a cult mafia.
Franny's toilet roll
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 1,580
Need Rabin to make a comment on Twitter, that'll get the ball rolling
Franknorgrovesnephew
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 4,548
IF IT WAS THE OTHER WAY ROUND WE WOULD BE GETTING LYNCHED NOW.
Bald fraud
Well-Known Member
YepIf it was us it be front and back pages tomorrow with a massive Cheaters or Scandal.