Var debate 2019/20

[blueinsa]

It's indefensible.

The game is being fucking ruined.

 

[BlueHammer85]

It's indefensible.

The game is being fucking ruined.

It’s highlighting just how wrong the officials have always got it.

 

[kaz7]

Nice of them to change the fucking rules now that we have been screwed over several times,the rules should have stayed the same all season then reflect and change it for next season,it's not fair to start giving things to teams that were not allowed before
No communicating about the rules changing,more stealth,no wonder people are convinced it's bent
The rags game today,i rest my point

 

[Tommy_Catons_Perm]

There is no way they could even know if they got half of the right though - VAR told them they had - though if Silva got a touch then they all got it wrong.

Sterling was only just onside - we have seena similar margin before where he was just offside - therefore VAR has helped.

I know. I was being facetious.

 

[Tommy_Catons_Perm]

Absolutely. Seems last weekend’s repeated cluserfuck was the final straw.

Seems it may have gone too far the wrong way though.

Who knows which way it will be next week.

 

[big gaz]

Disagree Simon. If all and sundry can see it, there is nowhere to hide for the officials

I thought you answered that very diplomatically and saved me getting a ban, cheers mosssideblue xx

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Problem in Germany is that subs always warm behind the goal line they are defending, rather than along the touchline. The video of that incident is earlier in this thread, he didn't stop it going out of play, a shot was going about 5 yards wide, and was heading towards him so he just stopped it with his foot, his foot prevented the whole ball going out of play (most of it had, a nothing else was going to stop it), so anyone with an ounce of sense lets the keeper take the goal kick, but within the rules they were correct, and he was wrong, but when was common sense ever applied by referee's ?

Common sense is the last thing that refs are allowed to administer. Common sense would not be pulling the Dippers out of the shite on 70 or 80 mins when they need a goal.

 

[sam 1980]

Very harsh to disallow that Arsenal goal

 

[Shuffs]

So...jusf saw the Liverpool penalty.

Surely it was a foul on Aurier as he was in possession and about to clear the ball?

Or are there new rules in place?

 

[davyhulme blue]

So...jusf saw the Liverpool penalty.

Surely it was a foul on Aurier as he was in possession and about to clear the ball?

Or are there new rules in place?

Exactly how I saw it