Var debate 2019/20

[ali benarbia's studs]

constantine?, you useless bent ****.

 

[CityWest]

Ffs

 

[Saddleworth2]

So much wrong that is never explained.

1. Both Bernie and TAA handled the ball. Bernie was unavoidable but TAA wasn't, so what reason did they give for disallowing the penalty or not disallowing the resultant goal
2. Their second was shown once on Sky and the pundits all agreed it was onside. Why is there so many people saying it was offside?
3. The push on Raz was blatant. What possible reason is there not to give that? Penalties are being given at the slightest contact. This was a push in the back.

They must be pressured to explain themselves.

 

[jimharri]

 

[MillionMilesAway]

Ffs

The push in the back looked really obvious.
The armstrike (top right) I don't think was a penalty - close to him and close to Sterling.
Offside I'd have expected onscreen review and an 'official' picture.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Var is a tool for mike Riley to back the ref regardless of how blatant anything is
To everyone else var should be a tool to Correct incorrect decisions
Only in England can we fuck something up that is so fucking simple.
It’s arrogent people protecting the status quo

The wankers in the VAR FYOvan know full well that there is no accountability for any decision they make whatsoever. And the more they forensically scrutinise an incident, the longer they take to deliberate, the happier PiGMOL, the PL, the FArce will be because any decision, even those in other games will screw us over and it cements the outcome so welcomed by the RDAHMeedya!

 

[TommyBenarbia]

Follow a blogger/ex-journo on Facebook, says that he has been told by an "impeccable" source that VAR wasn't actually in use today. At least for the first half.

Due to technical problems

 

[I'm Blue]

Off Read but never red on Facebook.
If there’s any truth in it I don’t know, but it would explain a lot.


BREAKING NEWS AND ABSOLUTELY NO BULLSHIT...

We have it from an IMPECCABLE source that due to technical issues there was no VAR in use at today’s game - for the first half at least - possibly longer.

The match officials and Sky were informed - approximately 10 minutes before kick off. They were then asked/directed to do everything they could to make it appear that VAR was in use as usual.

That would go a long way to explaining why there were no VAR lines of Liverpool’s second goal and also why the goal was given with what - 10 seconds of so called VAR analysis? Sky resorted to drawing their own ‘VAR’ lines - lines which are questionable depending on which angle is taken.

As we all know VAR takes way too long and that’s why it attracts so much criticism, but magically today, it was giving feedback in a matter of seconds.

Both Liverpool and City only found out about the lack of VAR at half time, hence Pep’s reaction towards the officials

It appears the Premier League and PGMOL were, at the very least deceitful and dishonest today.

Whether the two clubs have been instructed to stay quiet about the VAR farce remains to be seen, but whichever way you cut it, it’s plain wrong and is hoodwinking the fans.

If anyone reading this wants to decry this post - go ahead - we really don’t give a shit! We’re just reporting what has been told to us by a person who was VERY closely involved in today’s game at Anfield.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

So much wrong that is never explained.

1. Both Bernie and TAA handled the ball. Bernie was unavoidable but TAA wasn't, so what reason did they give for disallowing the penalty or not disallowing the resultant goal
2. Their second was shown once on Sky and the pundits all agreed it was onside. Why is there so many people saying it was offside?
3. The push on Raz was blatant. What possible reason is there not to give that? Penalties are being given at the slightest contact. This was a push in the back.

They must be pressured to explain themselves.

They won't.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Where is the consistency?

Consistency doesn't deliver the necessary outcome!