ali benarbia's studs
Well-Known Member
salah was .7 metres offside, by his standards that`s four nose lengths.
well if thats the case the game should not have kicked off, if the ref faild to turn up pre VAR they could not continue with just two linesmen
There’s no guarantee it’s true, but it makes a hell of a lot of sense.If and it is a big if, that is true and be proven to be true it will lift the lid of this league and its corruption and we should demand the game is replayed as a minimum.
It's a great opportunity for PGMOL to explain every step of that decision.
From Bernardo to Arnold to a handball leading up to a goal.
For me it was no handball on Bernardo, handball on Arnold and a penalty.
The very worst case for us should have been handball on Bernardo, advantage given and then called back for a Liverpool free.
PGMOL should explain how a Liverpool goal is the correct decision but I'm convinced he doesn't want clarity in the rules. He wants vagueness and wiggle room to justify whatever decision his refs want to make.
if its true it will def come out as to many people would have known to have kept it under the carpetThere’s no guarantee it’s true, but it makes a hell of a lot of sense.
No var replays showed, how quick all the decisions were made, the offside with no lines on the players, no different angles on the replays.
We should be screaming it from the rooftops if true.
HOLY SHIT (if true)
Liverpool gained possession of the ball with Arnold's handball and subsequently scored a goal. I understood the rules were changed this season disallow such goals. I don't understand why the goal was not disallowed. Is there any reason why it should not be disallowed?It's a great opportunity for PGMOL to explain every step of that decision.
From Bernardo to Arnold to a handball leading up to a goal.
For me it was no handball on Bernardo, handball on Arnold and a penalty.
The very worst case for us should have been handball on Bernardo, advantage given and then called back for a Liverpool free.
PGMOL should explain how a Liverpool goal is the correct decision but I'm convinced he doesn't want clarity in the rules. He wants vagueness and wiggle room to justify whatever decision his refs want to make.
They will only suffer at the likes of city though, still get loads of brainless tourists turning up at anfield and Trafford to watch a product that is like WWE x Harlem Globe trotters.Gates will suffer from the ordinary fan, the lifeblood of the clubs up and down the country saying no more.
Issue is the clubs dont give a fuck and will see it as an opportunity to further monetise the seat and replace with yet more corporates with bottomless pockets after a magnificent matchday experience.