Do we actually have a transfer strategy?

Of course we have a strategy and it’s served us well in the past 3 years. We do seem to penny pinch though on certain players? We need to be more pro active in the right positions and use our financial resources to better the first team and not just the squad? Sometimes it’s not about resale value and imo we should offer up £90-100m for koulibaly as we would still get 4 top years out of him while allowing Garcia and Taylor Harwood-Bellis to get more experience and top level game time
Our strategy buying defenders has been appalling since the takeover and still continues to this day with Laporte being the exception. Stones, Otamendi, Mangala christ thats about 120 million and none of them cut the mustard (Otamendi for one season).

If we had world class centre backs as well as Laporte, we would be almost unbeatable. I think our full backs are good enough even though Mendy injuries are concern.
 
We definitely have a strategy, and I think it's generally the right one, but where I think we go wrong sometimes is in the approach. We need to be more ruthless and proactive in the market; recently it feels like we're always reacting to something.

Whats the point of having one of the best scouting networks in the world if we're so thrown off by Vinnie deciding to leave a month prior to the end of the season that the only person we've come up with to replace him is Harry Maguire at 60 or 70 million pounds? Similarly the only player we identified to be our third or fourth winger the season before was Mahrez at a club record fee, or before that with Jorginho as the only player worth buying to be our new defensive midfielder, leaving us to hope and pray that Fernandinho didn't get hurt. Why have we spent the last two years betting the season on £8m and £2m midfielders in Delph and Zinchenko respectively stepping up at leftback?

If you want to take the stance in the market that City won't overpay for players, we won't get mugged off, etc, thats fine. Thats great even! But you need to have other options! Saying that we'll buy someone in a position that we really need, but only for X, and if we don't get him we'll get no one is nonsensical and leave us with holes that we've been lucky to get away with sometimes and unlucky other times. I said in another thread that not signing a new centerback this summer probably ruined this season, and yeah thats bad luck, but every year we seem to gamble with something exactly like this. It was just a matter of time until it didn't work out.
If we had gone for the 2nd, 3rd or 4th choice when it was clear we couldn’t get Jorginho then we wouldn’t have had a squad place available for Rodri who seems like he’s the perfect signing from what little we have seen so far.

If you extrapolate that same strategy over 3-4 transfer windows, you will eventually have 6-8 players who you don’t really want, who weren’t the first choice and who you aren’t 100% comfortable building a team around.

That’s when you end up in mid table positions like Trafford Rangers, with a squad of Ugly ****, Smalling, Tom Daley, the other Tom Daley, the third Tom Daley, Fred, the two Chelsea rejects Matic and Mata, Fat Fuck, Fat Headed Fuck and some lanky prick who pays half his salary to his “fresh prince of bell air” barber.

I completely understand it will catch us out one year, maybe even two years but it’s better to have a squad full of players you really want and know you can trust long term who will provide sustainability and a return on investment (e.g. Sane) if we or they decide it’s just not working for that individual. Quality, not quantity.
 
If we had gone for the 2nd, 3rd or 4th choice when it was clear we couldn’t get Jorginho then we wouldn’t have had a squad place available for Rodri who seems like he’s the perfect signing from what little we have seen so far.

If you extrapolate that same strategy over 3-4 transfer windows, you will eventually have 6-8 players who you don’t really want, who weren’t the first choice and who you aren’t 100% comfortable building a team around.

That’s when you end up in mid table positions like Trafford Rangers, with a squad of Ugly ****, Smalling, Tom Daley, the other Tom Daley, the third Tom Daley, Fred, the two Chelsea rejects Matic and Mata, Fat Fuck, Fat Headed Fuck and some lanky prick who pays half his salary to his “fresh prince of bell air” barber.

I completely understand it will catch us out one year, maybe even two years but it’s better to have a squad full of players you really want and know you can trust long term who will provide sustainability and a return on investment (e.g. Sane) if we or they decide it’s just not working for that individual. Quality, not quantity.
Totally, and it's a very fair point. The problem is, it buys into the idea that there's only one player worth going for, which just isn't true. You don't buy a second tier player just to buy someone, you identify more than one first tier players, of which there are many. We supposedly have one of the best scouting operations in the world and then we end up targeting someone from Leicester.

The same summer we missed Jorginho, Rodri transferred from Villareal to Atleti (the deal was agreed earlier than the our transfer fell apart, but still). There are always other guys out there.
 
Last edited:
Our strategy buying defenders has been appalling since the takeover and still continues to this day with Laporte being the exception. Stones, Otamendi, Mangala christ thats about 120 million and none of them cut the mustard (Otamendi for one season).

If we had world class centre backs as well as Laporte, we would be almost unbeatable. I think our full backs are good enough even though Mendy injuries are concern.
Agreed, but, personaly I still think are full backs are bang average in terms of spending near 200m on them!
 
That’s when you end up in mid table positions like Trafford Rangers, with a squad of Ugly ****, Smalling, Tom Daley, the other Tom Daley, the third Tom Daley, Fred, the two Chelsea rejects Matic and Mata, Fat Fuck, Fat Headed Fuck and some lanky prick who pays half his salary to his “fresh prince of bell air” barber.

This is ace.
 
Our strategy buying defenders has been appalling since the takeover and still continues to this day with Laporte being the exception. Stones, Otamendi, Mangala christ thats about 120 million and none of them cut the mustard (Otamendi for one season).

If we had world class centre backs as well as Laporte, we would be almost unbeatable. I think our full backs are good enough even though Mendy injuries are concern.
It's amazing the difference just one world class CB can make to the whole defence though. With Laporte we look very solid. Without him, we look lost at times. And to be honest, Liverpool were in exactly the same position until they bought Van Dijk. They'd wasted so much money on average defenders. Same with the rags after Ferdinand (it remains to be seen whether Maguire will solve that), same with Chelsea after Terry. The reason it's been such a problem position for us is basically because for years Kompany has been that player for us, but he was consistently injured for about a third of the season minimum every year. It's actually pretty rare for a team to genuinely have two commanding CBs of the type that will make everyone around them better. I hoped Stones could become that. In our 100 points season, he looked immense for the first half of the season, got injured, and hasn't consistently looked as good ever since. The fact that he wasn't really preferred for any of last season's title run in, reverting to Kompany when it really matters, suggests that Pep isn't happy with his progress. Sometimes it's tempting to just bite the bullet and say that we've already wasted shitloads of money and just go all in for an £80m Maguire, but the problem is that there's no guarantee that he wouldn't be similarly average. Let's be honest, Mangala and Stones were both examples of us just saying fuck it and paying what it takes.
 
Totally, and it's a very fair point. The problem is, it buys into the idea that there's only one player worth going for, which just isn't true. You don't buy a second tier player just to buy someone, you identify more than one first tier players, of which there are many. We supposedly have one of the best scouting operations in the world and then we end up targeting someone from Leicester.
But that plays into this fallacy that there's going to be some unknown player out there (homegrown, don't forget) who is good enough to transform our entire defence and yet simultaneously playing at a level that no-one has heard of him. A great scouting network finds the players that have potential to make it given time, development and perhaps the odd loan; the Zinchenkos, not finished products.

The other one you hear is when a mid-table side finds a player and then a year later, they're quoting £60m for him, and people question why we didn't notice him before them. But the reality is that a mid-table side is able to give more time for a player like this to adapt to the league and develop as a player. If we bought a player like Tyrone Mings, chances are he'd have been on our bench almost every game, chances are Laporte doesn't get injured so there is no crisis in defence that needs him, and chances are that he doesn't develop into this quality Premier League centre back that we all now know he is, rather than the quality Championship defender he was when he was up for sale. It's easy to say in hindsight that a player like Mings would be useful now Laporte actually did get injured, but you've got to be buying players who can challenge Laporte as the best defender at the club, not fill in for him on the off chance that he gets injured.
 
Totally, and it's a very fair point. The problem is, it buys into the idea that there's only one player worth going for, which just isn't true. You don't buy a second tier player just to buy someone, you identify more than one first tier players, of which there are many. We supposedly have one of the best scouting operations in the world and then we end up targeting someone from Leicester.

The same summer we missed Jorginho, Rodri transferred from Villareal to Atleti (the deal was agreed earlier than the our transfer fell apart, but still). There are always other guys out there.
That’s were we will always disagree, I think it’s way too optimistic to believe there’s more than one “perfect” player at any one time. Occasionally it may happen but it’ll be the exception rather than the rule, as there’s too many factors to take into consideration (e.g. background, transfer fees, wages structures, availability, personality, attitude, agents, injury records... I could go on forever). The most important is integrity, to the player(s), to the club(s) and to our current squad.

Let’s use Rodri as an example, we identified him as our #1 option this summer presumably. We make sure he’s initially happy to join us, we negotiate the transfer fee (or release clause in his case), then wait until he’s been on holiday to try to complete the deal. While all that’s happen you’ve got the constant press speculation, everyone knows who we want as #1.

Can you imagine being option #2? You might get someone that still wants to come but there’s already doubt in the players mind, his agents mind, his clubs plans to replace him etc. Suddenly Rodri says he’s coming, you’ve pissed off a player, an agent and at least one club (if not more because the replacement they were planning will be at a club too who will be pissed off waiting and so on). Reputations suffer and no one trusts you in the transfer market after a while, so future #1 options don’t know if they’re 1, 2 or even 3 on the list and aren’t interested. You have to retain integrity in everything you do in you want long term sustainability and trust.

On the flip side, Rodri admitted himself he had to toughen up and become more defensively resilient in the summer of 2018 which was why he specifically chose to go to A.Madrid, so he wasn’t a “perfect” fit at that stage. As much as you’ll like to blame our scouts for not identifying him as a potential target then, you have to understand we’re the best team in Europe and probably World football right now (injuries/VAR excluded), due to identifying players like Sterling, De Bruyne, Laporte, Ederson, Jesus, Bernardo and Sane who were perfect for us.
 
Last edited:
Generally we've got more transfers right than wrong, including plenty of dodged bullets.

In my opinion our one big mistake was baulking at £75m for van Dijk. If we'd signed him we'd be so much better now, and scousers still average. Could have sold Ota two years ago, had vD, Stones and Laporte plus a youngsters getting a chance in cup games, etc after Vinny left. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Hopefully we learnt from it and pay what it takes next time Pep really wants a player.

Maguire was never good enough, I'm glad we didn't waste £80m on him. But next time the right player is available we need to get him, whatever rags, Chelsea or Barca, etc bid if we really need him to improve the team. No getting cold feet for the sake of an extra £10m. We can afford it. Win the league again and the prize money and sponsorship probably cover most of the extra wages anyway.
 
Agreed, but, personaly I still think are full backs are bang average in terms of spending near 200m on them!
I don't think Cancelo is average by any means. Walker definitely is overpriced and Mendy cant be relied upon. We probably have to invest in LB in near future.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.