brummie blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 8,927
Sky Sports News is about as reliable as as news source as loose women.
Just because these pricks sit there in suits doesn't add any weight to the bullshit they peddle.
Sky sports is nothing more than a magazine programme full of opinions and very selective guests who are willing or desperate enough to spout the same rhetoric.
If you think about it, what Manchester City has achieved over the past two seasons and the impact we have had on the premier league Sky Sports should be singer our praise. Could you imagine the fawning over the likes of Liverpool or the rags if they managed to pull it off?
So lets all remember that Sky Sports has got absolutely no integrity whatsoever and is nothing more than a magazine programme.
Spot on.
I gave up watching the pre-match build up to live games, the half and full time coverage, Sky sports news, the debate programme and Sunday supplement ages ago.
All of these productions have been full of Liverpool and United bias for years, just look at the amount of presenters, commentars and pundits from these clubs, and then there's the twats they employ on the matchday score programme. BT sport isn't much better.
The occasional appearance of Hart, Toure, Lescott and Richards has helped a little, but the questions are often loads against them or they get less time than other to speak.
I long for the day Sky have a option to turn off match commentary and just have crowd noise.
Many will say, don't have Sky then, but I don't watch Sky for the opinion, I watch for the match coverage which is decent.
Sky have been playing to their subscribers for years, and unfortunately most are United and Liverpool fans.