You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Peter Drury replaces Martin Tyler on Sky Sports
- Thread starter MickyBenno81
- Start date
Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 12,983
Ahhh. Explains the holes in the cheese
It’s not the holes you want to worry about, it’s the ones he filled in.
1961_vintage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 14,650
People can be very ignorant at times. Tyler works for a company for whom their subscriber base is probably made up of around 70% across the rags and Livarpool. He will either choose and/or be under instruction to ensure that his work ensures that they are happy and retained. So as well as over-hyping their shite, being totally underwhelmed by anything those filthy lottery winning, FFP cheating dirty arab Manc twats do is just the cherry on the sycophantic revenue generating cake. If that upsets what in percentage terms is a tiny element of the $ky viewing population then my guess is that they think it's a risk worth taking.
D
D
Deleted member 77198
Guest
Really?! They are the two biggest supported clubs but there are that many football fans of so many clubs around the country that I’d be surprised if they even made up 30% together.People can be very ignorant at times. Tyler works for a company for whom their subscriber base is probably made up of around 70% across the rags and Livarpool. He will either choose and/or be under instruction to ensure that his work ensures that they are happy and retained. So as well as over-hyping their shite, being totally underwhelmed by anything those filthy lottery winning, FFP cheating dirty arab Manc twats do is just the cherry on the sycophantic revenue generating cake. If that upsets what in percentage terms is a tiny element of the $ky viewing population then my guess is that they think it's a risk worth taking.
It’s a bit paradox really. United and Liverpool are simultaneously the most popular and unpopular teams in the country.Really?! They are the two biggest supported clubs but there are that many football fans of so many clubs around the country that I’d be surprised if they even made up 30% together.
urban genie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 31,258
Who cares?
I know how good we are, couldn't give a shite if the pundits and comentators dont.
Honestly when football on tv first became a regular thing the scousers were dominant, when sky then upped the tv coverage and the prem was born ex scousers were always gonna be the choice of expert pundit because if the 20 years before, then the rags started dominating so ex rags became regulars, the comentators were always a bit shit bar two or three.
Now after the last decade you have dickov, lescott, dunne, hinchcliffe regularary co-comemtating or punditing on all the channels, and now micah everywhere on BT, sky and BBC.
Yeah we are not the glamour team and no one gives us credit as they are still so far up liverpool and the rags arses, but if we have a decade like the last there will be more and more ex city players as pundits.
Also have you ever read scouse and rag fans talking about tyler, they honestly believe he is bias against them and you know if we did have a commentator that loved us we would still whinge about them.
Also what would you have to moan about
I know how good we are, couldn't give a shite if the pundits and comentators dont.
Honestly when football on tv first became a regular thing the scousers were dominant, when sky then upped the tv coverage and the prem was born ex scousers were always gonna be the choice of expert pundit because if the 20 years before, then the rags started dominating so ex rags became regulars, the comentators were always a bit shit bar two or three.
Now after the last decade you have dickov, lescott, dunne, hinchcliffe regularary co-comemtating or punditing on all the channels, and now micah everywhere on BT, sky and BBC.
Yeah we are not the glamour team and no one gives us credit as they are still so far up liverpool and the rags arses, but if we have a decade like the last there will be more and more ex city players as pundits.
Also have you ever read scouse and rag fans talking about tyler, they honestly believe he is bias against them and you know if we did have a commentator that loved us we would still whinge about them.
Also what would you have to moan about
I believe he’s the the longtime ‘Secret’ ingredient in PrimulaIt’s not the holes you want to worry about, it’s the ones he filled in.
dennishasdoneit
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 May 2008
- Messages
- 10,185
- Team supported
- Manchester City FC.
And how does that logic work when applied to the tv licence funded ,impartial, BBC..?People can be very ignorant at times. Tyler works for a company for whom their subscriber base is probably made up of around 70% across the rags and Livarpool. He will either choose and/or be under instruction to ensure that his work ensures that they are happy and retained. So as well as over-hyping their shite, being totally underwhelmed by anything those filthy lottery winning, FFP cheating dirty arab Manc twats do is just the cherry on the sycophantic revenue generating cake. If that upsets what in percentage terms is a tiny element of the $ky viewing population then my guess is that they think it's a risk worth taking.
Can you imagine if he had been commentating on todays game?
I dont expect anyone to know, but when was the last super sunday he didnt bother working. It was refreshing to say the least