Set in stone ? Except for Liverpool players you meanIt did brush his hand,but seeing as the rule is set in stone any handball now,it’s the right decision..
Set in stone ? Except for Liverpool players you meanIt did brush his hand,but seeing as the rule is set in stone any handball now,it’s the right decision..
It didn’t glance of it, it knocked into the path of the attacked who then scored. Utterly accidental, but still totally set up the chance.Arm in natural position but glanced off it - no goal... very harsh.
Not sure it's set in stone for everyone,that's the problem i thinkIt did brush his hand,but seeing as the rule is set in stone any handball now,it’s the right decision..
Any?It did brush his hand,but seeing as the rule is set in stone any handball now,it’s the right decision..
The arm was in a natural position - good enough for a defender - which part of the pitch do you change from a defender to an attacker?It didn’t glance of it, it knocked into the path of the attacked who then scored. Utterly accidental, but still totally set up the chance.
Yep, I’m sort of ok with that kind of handball being given, the ball was going nowhere near the scorer until the handball and it led directly to the goal, nothing like an accidental brush and then plenty of work to do to score.It didn’t glance of it, it knocked into the path of the attacked who then scored. Utterly accidental, but still totally set up the chance.
I posted set in stone but forgot to say that only applies to certain teams,how the fuck did VAR not award us a pen for that,cheating pure and simple to help get the scousers the desired result ..Any?