dickie davies
Well-Known Member
2019 car is a different model year and vastly better car.
Beemer is a beemer and a bloody good car
I look at older cars on the road and the 3 series, bar just one model, hasn't aged at all
2019 car is a different model year and vastly better car.
Beemer is a beemer and a bloody good car
I look at older cars on the road and the 3 series, bar just one model, hasn't aged at all
Jesus christ! Why do folk bother with this car rental nonsense? Just buy a car and its yours, and therefore what you can afford. Is it me or am I missing something or way behind the times? People must have more money than me to jizz about and Im doing ok for a salary and extras I thinkNo I think you're right, the OP has compared the difference in monthly payment over 4 years with the 10000 mile excess for 1 year, need to multiply that mileage excess by 4, OP.
If you want another calculation, divide the mileage excess by 12 to get the monthly amount, 10000/12 = 833, so multiply by £0.1404 = £117 per month extra, equals £40 per month more than the 15k plan.
Jesus christ! Why do folk bother with this car rental nonsense? Just buy a car and its yours, and therefore what you can afford. Is it me or am I missing something or way behind the times? People must have more money than me to jizz about and Im doing ok for a salary and extras I think
Unfortunately so, put me off for good. Thankfully I had a video of the car before the twat arrived, who said we'd have to pay for 6 separate marks on the exterior and an alloy refurb in his report (ended up wanting £900). Refused to sign and told them to take me to court if they wanted the money as I had video proof most of the marks fitted well within the wear and tear parameters. Eventually after 8 months they backed down and accepted £130 for two marks I was happy to pay for originally. It took 6 months for them to view the video, then 2 further months for a thinly veiled apology of sorts. Never again.Quick question.
my company lease car went back on Friday and some dude turned up, did a full assessment and picked up loads of little issues. Chipped windscreen, a couple small dents, scuffed alloys. The thing that annoyed me was he claimed one of the passenger doors was a different colour and had been re-sprayed....it definitely hadn’t.
upshot was I refused to sign his form to accept that what he was telling me wasn’t outside normal wear and tear....he then stalked off and said he’d notify Arval of my ‘dispute’.
does anyone have any experience of this?
Unfortunately so, put me off for good. Thankfully I had a video of the car before the twat arrived, who said we'd have to pay for 6 separate marks on the exterior and an alloy refurb in his report (ended up wanting £900). Refused to sign and told them to take me to court if they wanted the money as I had video proof most of the marks fitted well within the wear and tear parameters. Eventually after 8 months they backed down and accepted £130 for two marks I was happy to pay for originally. It took 6 months for them to view the video, then 2 further months for a thinly veiled apology of sorts. Never again.
Yes.Jesus christ! Why do folk bother with this car rental nonsense? Just buy a car and its yours, and therefore what you can afford. Is it me or am I missing something or way behind the times? People must have more money than me to jizz about and Im doing ok for a salary and extras I think