Pingu the Penguin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 7,013
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Investigation in Liverpool's 'hacking' of our computer systems
- Thread starter Franny's toilet roll
- Start date
Do honestly think it's over?Ha, it’s over. The sooner we accept that the better. They’re evidently cheating bastards, but City played this pretty badly and ended up tying our own hands.
Somebody leaked it to the times for a reason, that reason hasn't gone away, it ain't over
So it is over? No goings on behind the scenes or anything?Ha, it’s over. The sooner we accept that the better. They’re evidently cheating bastards, but City played this pretty badly and ended up tying our own hands.
I’m shocked...
Unless something significant changes then the media won’t report on it any more, and slowly the story will die. Not really sure what people think will happen from here?!Do honestly think it's over?
Somebody leaked it to the times for a reason, that reason hasn't gone away, it ain't over
Keep the story alive, fsg, Boston red Sox and LiVARpool , a few words connect them and one is ........Unless something significant changes then the media won’t report on it any more, and slowly the story will die. Not really sure what people think will happen from here?!
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 8,533
Ha, it’s over. The sooner we accept that the better. They’re evidently cheating bastards, but City played this pretty badly and ended up tying our own hands.
I’m hoping we’ve now played our hand behind closed doors & allowing the Dippers & UEFA to save face.
what that is I don’t know but I can’t for my life imagine that this was leaked only to be covered up.
My understanding is we took their Money.
The money came with legal obligations.Liverpool legal side not accepting responsibility for what was clearly "Black and White"
Now none of the media will touch this story with a Barge Pole.
We are good at shooting ourselves in the Foot.
If the Shoe had been on the other Foot.Liverpool would have dragged us over Hot Coals,through every court in the land.They would never acted like amateurs accepting a measly £1,000 000 in compensation with conditions.It would have been full on MSM character assassination of MCFC.
The money came with legal obligations.Liverpool legal side not accepting responsibility for what was clearly "Black and White"
Now none of the media will touch this story with a Barge Pole.
We are good at shooting ourselves in the Foot.
If the Shoe had been on the other Foot.Liverpool would have dragged us over Hot Coals,through every court in the land.They would never acted like amateurs accepting a measly £1,000 000 in compensation with conditions.It would have been full on MSM character assassination of MCFC.
Get them down to Lancaster gate then!
Why Lancaster Gate? The FA haven’t been there for about 20 years.
My understanding is we took their Money.
The money came with legal obligations.Liverpool legal side not accepting responsibility for what was clearly "Black and White"
Now none of the media will touch this story with a Barge Pole.
We are good at shooting ourselves in the Foot.
If the Shoe had been on the other Foot.Liverpool would have dragged us over Hot Coals,through every court in the land.They would never acted like amateurs accepting a measly £1,000 000 in compensation with conditions.It would have been full on MSM character assassination of MCFC.
I'd guess Liverpool insisted from the start that they knew nothing about it, that the employees acted on their own initiative and that was going to be their story come what may. City were then in the position of possibly having to prosecute a few ex-employees. We probably figured that there wasn't a good outcome for Manchester City whatever the verdict....Elephant crushes ant type headlines or Ex-City employees victorious. Unless City can prove this went high up the Liverpool chain of command, there's not much joy for us in a criminal case. Proving it would probably require one of the perpetrators to turn on his current employers. They've got a secure job with what they know, why throw it away or risk a midnight visit from a masked stranger (called Aldo).
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 15,617
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I'd guess Liverpool insisted from the start that they knew nothing about it, that the employees acted on their own initiative and that was going to be their story come what may. City were then in the position of possibly having to prosecute a few ex-employees. We probably figured that there wasn't a good outcome for Manchester City whatever the verdict....Elephant crushes ant type headlines or Ex-City employees victorious. Unless City can prove this went high up the Liverpool chain of command, there's not much joy for us in a criminal case. Proving it would probably require one of the perpetrators to turn on his current employers. They've got a secure job with what they know, why throw it away or risk a midnight visit from a masked stranger (called Aldo).
Theres only one problem with what you say ..
"I'd guess Liverpool insisted from the start that they knew nothing about it, that the employees acted on their own initiative "
Than why did liverpool promote all of them after they had done this ?
Any other company where an employee had cost the company to pay a million quid hush money would at least be demoted mostly likely sacked , but liverpool promoted all 3 of them !.......liverpool know what their employees where doing.......I guess !