You can do what you want, but if you attack him on that ground rather than on the substance of what he says, you damage the credibility of those City fans who are legitimately attacking the substance of what he says, an altogether more powerful line of attack. I can't stop you, but I think your stance is a little stupid and rather detrimental to those of us who are attempting to go down more productive avenues.
They have been gagging to write this for ten yrs,it's like christmas for them,they don't like writing we might win on appeal thoughHe’s not the only journo that has lost his mind over the last few days.
Puma completely trusts us
Hypothetically speaking, would a £75m sponsorship from a company that can only afford £10m be considered a kosher arrangement?If the stuff on Twitter is true this looks increasingly like a repeat of the PSG case with UEFA saying that our sponsorship values are overstated. I thought our sponsorships were broadly in line with those of the other large clubs in the PL and certainly far behind where PSGs ended up. This increasingly looks like a charge brought in anger rather than on the basis of facts. Can’t see how PSG can get waved through and we don’t. The Rags get far more from Chevrolet than we do from Etihad. You can’t buy a Chevrolet car in Europe and the Rags are not in the CL so how can theirs be justified as more valuable than ours? I’m assuming City will have had a number of consultants objectively valuing our sponsorship deals.
Why would Puma be informed of this though?Puma coming out like that is so odd.
Really odd.
I can’t fathom why they wouldn’t keep quiet until the end of it. Nobody was attacking them, other than the odd anonymous Twitter handle maybe, they weren’t in the press and weren’t at risk.
They’ve put themselves, in terms of PR, at risk by backing us.
This says to me that they are absolutely sure we’re innocent and it must mean that the club have gone through the evidence with them.
In other news, all staff at City have been told by Soriano that everything stays the same and that we’ll win this 100%. My mate is good mates with one of the ground staff, we get freebies off him some times.
they were also known as the Bank of England, liverpool had littlewoods money which transformed them from a small second division team and the rags wouldn't be in existence without investment. So it was ok all of for them in the past but its not ok for us now!! Seems legit!!
Lawnmowers?Puma coming out like that is so odd.
Really odd.
I can’t fathom why they wouldn’t keep quiet until the end of it. Nobody was attacking them, other than the odd anonymous Twitter handle maybe, they weren’t in the press and weren’t at risk.
They’ve put themselves, in terms of PR, at risk by backing us.
This says to me that they are absolutely sure we’re innocent and it must mean that the club have gone through the evidence with them.
In other news, all staff at City have been told by Soriano that everything stays the same and that we’ll win this 100%. My mate is good mates with one of the ground staff, we get freebies off him some times.
I will suggest your route is twitter whilst the vast majority on here, dont ever look at it and i dont see any issue in him getting dogs abuse on here because frankly he deserves it.
No blue i know would talk about our club like he does and no blue i know would suck up to the mini rags like he does either.
He can live with the fall out from those choices, especially on the biggest City forum.
Why would Puma be informed of this though?
Especially when so much now hinges on nothing leaking out
Lawnmowers?