UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[CC1]

I'm glad he said something but the production of that video was a bit weird, panning to shots of all the great things the club has done felt a bit propaganda-ey.

Cant believe they couldn't find someone from independent media to ask the same softbakk questions though, someone like Lineker would have loved to sit there and ask those same questions for the BBC.

Why would we trust any of the media? It all gets twisted.

 

[mat]

I know its early days but does it feel like some of the press/media beginning to change their view on us ?

Souness' missus is a blue she'll have been reducating him.

:)

 

[smevchenko]

And why the fuck should we give the BBC exclusive access to our chairman?

CEO

 

[WillDaws]

"Less about justice.... and more about politics"

 

[chaddblue]

I'm glad he said something but the production of that video was a bit weird, panning to shots of all the great things the club has done felt a bit propaganda-ey.

Cant believe they couldn't find someone from independent media to ask the same softbakk questions though, someone like Lineker would have loved to sit there and ask those same questions for the BBC.

And then they would have edited it and twisted it as they wanted

 

[cheekybids]

I'm glad he said something but the production of that video was a bit weird, panning to shots of all the great things the club has done felt a bit propaganda-ey.

Cant believe they couldn't find someone from independent media to ask the same softbakk questions though, someone like Lineker would have loved to sit there and ask those same questions for the BBC.

I think that was very important & he made he point about the negative under tones that they have to deal with.

not many know what they’ve done for Manchester.

 

[Jazzman]

Well UEFA have broken the "Pinch" agreement they came to with us in 2014 that was supposed to draw a line under the whole affair, so it would be no surprise to me if we were to go to a Swiss court over that. Especially as UEFA went through our sponsorship arrangements in fine detail between 2012-2014.

We want our money back that paid as part of that pinch.

 

[mcfcphil]

I'm glad he said something but the production of that video was a bit weird, panning to shots of all the great things the club has done felt a bit propaganda-ey.

Cant believe they couldn't find someone from independent media to ask the same softbakk questions though, someone like Lineker would have loved to sit there and ask those same questions for the BBC.

That interview would have been run past legal and probably edited numerous times as a result. You can't do that with external media and the risk would be too great to not have final control over the output.

 

[domalino]

Key part of the interview for me is this.

"They relied more on out of context stolen emails than all the other evidence that we provided about what actually happened".

That screams out to me about the email saying ADUG should supply the Etihad money which we now know didnt happen because the money came from the EC.

We know Leterme has a habit of just ignoring evidence he doesnt like without explanation (like the 5m valuation of PSGs qatar sponsorship).

If he did something like only accept the (out of context) email saying ADUG funded Etihad as fact, that would make us guilty to him even if the club had "irrefutable" evidence otherwise.

 

[bluedan]

Nice one Ferran and team. Smashed it lad!

Confidence is building for our day in court against UEFA/MUFC/Arsenal/Liverpool/Juve/Bayern and the so called pond scum Media etc

Hopefully it be one of our greatest ever victories.