flook
Well-Known Member
Correct. This seasons version of VAR has been called “illegal” by IFAB twice. Along with this we can all guess why:
has it? link please, wasn't aware of that
Correct. This seasons version of VAR has been called “illegal” by IFAB twice. Along with this we can all guess why:
Who’s fixing it for City to miss loads of brilliant chances in the games they should be winning?For me, it’s blatant orchestrated bias and our “friend” at football is fixed predicted this as early as September though this is a post in December:
https://footballisfixed.blogspot.com/2019/12/3-posts-of-corruption-past-present-yet.html?m=1
PepWho’s fixing it for City to miss loads of brilliant chances in the games they should be winning?
spoken like a true scouser full of shit, City continue to have scored the most goals and have the highest accuracyWho’s fixing it for City to miss loads of brilliant chances in the games they should be winning?
Yes they have. But they’ve lost six games as when. If your players had taken their chances then you may have lost fewer games - VAR was (aside from the game against Liverpool) no factor at all in those losses.spoken like a true scouser full of shit, City continue to have scored the most goals and have the highest accuracy
Why the fuck are you still here spouting shit? Haven’t you any walls that need rebuilding?Yes they have. But they’ve lost six games as when. If your players had taken their chances then you may have lost fewer games - VAR was (aside from the game against Liverpool) no factor at all in those losses.
If there really was a stitch up it’s a rubbish one considering City have lost games all by themselves without VAR intervention and Liverpool have had 5 goals ruled out.
I know your only getting your rocks off trolling, but before you get banned, City have had four first team players out in every game this season, most in defense so liverpools 14 goals better defense in 25 games is pretty crap, especially when liverpool play fat sams hoof ball defensive football.Yes they have. But they’ve lost six games as when. If your players had taken their chances then you may have lost fewer games - VAR was (aside from the game against Liverpool) no factor at all in those losses.
If there really was a stitch up it’s a rubbish one considering City have lost games all by themselves without VAR intervention and Liverpool have had 5 goals ruled out.
Thanks for that, i think it is a bit worrying that the only thing they are not talking about is the thing needed, ie an independent company running VAR as anything else will always be compromised by SKY`s wantsI was asking in general, are you saying they are all cheats or just the ones that make mistakes against Man City?