Important point in your post: lawyers must examine the oppos story and see how ours stands up to it. Grasp the facts, deconstruct both cases, then construct argumentsOnce got involved in a complex employment case - regarding “protected rights” for older employees a few years ago and whether they were consistent with age legislation. Employer said they weren’t and Union (CWU) said they were. Our side (the Employer) hired a QC Andrew Hochhauser - Essex Chambers. Christ he dismantled our side for breakfast before beating the living daylights out of the other side. His grasp of facts was immense, his power of argument something to behold - but Christ was he scary. Dunno what he cost but never been in a room with anyone as good as him before or since.
1 For own side, both attack and defence
2 Against oppos case
And ensure there are no surprises.