UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
Once got involved in a complex employment case - regarding “protected rights” for older employees a few years ago and whether they were consistent with age legislation. Employer said they weren’t and Union (CWU) said they were. Our side (the Employer) hired a QC Andrew Hochhauser - Essex Chambers. Christ he dismantled our side for breakfast before beating the living daylights out of the other side. His grasp of facts was immense, his power of argument something to behold - but Christ was he scary. Dunno what he cost but never been in a room with anyone as good as him before or since.
Important point in your post: lawyers must examine the oppos story and see how ours stands up to it. Grasp the facts, deconstruct both cases, then construct arguments
1 For own side, both attack and defence
2 Against oppos case
And ensure there are no surprises.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nmc
Probably because if we don’t hire the best UEFA will. They’ve had the deck stacked in their favour so far so we hopefully get to realign that at CAS.

Time will tell if we did break the rules, and if so by how much. If it proves we did, but we didn’t try our best to defend ourselves we’d feel foolish and be seen as pretty stupid (more so than we already appear for writing down in emails the stuff we did... that has got us into this mess). We need the best people to articulate our position as well as having the best create our case and hopefully rip theirs to pieces.

To put it into context about potential value. We probably paid the likes of Danny Mills, over the lifetime of his contract, significantly more than this guy and his team will cost.

Hopefully the lawyers give us a better return.
People grossly overestimate the influence an advocate has much of the time. In, I would say, three quarters of cases, no matter how good or bad someone’s case is presented (within certain parameters) the outcome is inevitable from the outset.

It’s that other 25% where skill, craft and judgement as an advocate make a real difference. That’s what the job is all about. Winning one of those.

City will want to give themselves the best possible chance. Every percentage could count.
 
I see city have hired David Pannick QC to represent them.

he was the fantastic silk who wiped the floor with govt in the brexit stuff. Gina millers lawyer.

20k a day apparently
If he gets us out of this mess should we all buy shirts with his name on the back?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.