UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[Ric]

Who says that this is the best lawyer in the world ?
Oh yea that’s right the bullshit media that open trap doors for us to fall into

No, most people in the legal field rate this guy extremely highly. Think some people are losing their heads completely about the media now. It’s a good thing that he’s representing us, nothing more.

 

[Kazzydeyna]

thanks Kazzydeyna for a mature and reasoned response as opposed to all the crap I’ve received on here for my comment.

I have little knowledge of the law but always felt that if you were in the right then no problem, you win.

It seems, not the case, you need to win by playing games and out manoeuvring your opponent. Why I don’t know.

The main point of my concern is that by appointing a skilled, the best there is lawyer, just maybe, our basic argument of righteousness, regarding no initial defence or simple proof of legitimate funds transfers does not exist at all. We are going to have to fight this on a technicality which, while hopefully winning the case, will not ultimately absolve City from holier than thou innocence.

It's okay to disagree mate. Emotions are running high right now for all of us.

Not being hyperbolic but we are in a fight for our credibility for the next 20 years here, it's not just a fight to get back into the CL next year.

It seems we are leaving nothing to chance and for me that's the right way to approach it.

 

[Bluekiwi]

We want to clear our name.

We should go after every tom dick and harry that has denigrated our club these past years - If Harry and Megan can cry foul and sue anybody for supposedly tarnishing their images, then so should we.

 

[razman]

As much as I respect Mullock, that smacks of click-bait nonsense.

The settlement with Liverpool done in 2014 does tie up our hand i reckon , so dont know how city will use it at CAS

 

[ganganvince]

The settlement with Liverpool done in 2014 does tie up our hand i reckon , so dont know how city will use it at CAS

If asked a question by a court or official body the NDA would be irrelevant

 

[r.soleofsalford]

It's okay to disagree mate. Emotions are running high right now for all of us.

Not being hyperbolic but we are in a fight for our credibility for the next 20 years here, it's not just a fight to get back into the CL next year.

It seems we are leaving nothing to chance and for me that's the right way to approach it.

Absolutely

 

[cheekybids]

The settlement with Liverpool done in 2014 does tie up our hand i reckon , so dont know how city will use it at CAS

we will proving that we are bound by rules with time limits that the G14 seemingly aren’t & that they a bunch of thieving cvnts, it used to be anything not bolted down now it’s scouting reports, your honour.

 

[richards30]

The settlement with Liverpool done in 2014 does tie up our hand i reckon , so dont know how city will use it at CAS

it will be relevant in the separate case in normal court after the CAS hearing.

 

[nmc]

The settlement with Liverpool done in 2014 does tie up our hand i reckon , so dont know how city will use it at CAS

Doesn’t tie our hands at all. NDA inadmissible in court. We can present any evidence that we think maybe relevant.

 

[blueinsa]

I have little knowledge of the law

Really? No one guessed.......