UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[blueinsa]

got a link.

It was attributed quotes mate in other articles.

 

[Blue Mist]

Despite being from Wythenshawe Taylor has cynically aligned himself with the Cheshire FA so that he can 'legitimately' (arf!) referee big matches involving City and United. For added legitimacy he is widely publicised as being a season ticket holder at Altrincham (at the insignificant cost to him of £225) yet I've never seen any reference to or photo of him actually turning up for games there.

I heard he was part of the 'Alty Tram Crew' who took on the Blazin' Squad one Saturday. He is now banned from Moss Lane and that is why you never see him there.

 

[The Light Was Yellow Sir]

No a Seaford is like a Clarkie only newer. (Seaford is the poster who worries the Sheikh is on dodgy ground because he has hired a brilliant lawyer rather than a shit one.)

People from Seaford are known as Shags. Which is nice...

 

[blueinsa]

im sure fhryve said they are a blue unless it’s a team of them.

I know this guy has worked for City in the last and was tasked with gathering info that led to certain refs disappearing from the game after fucking us over. He now says he wont work with us any longer because of security leaks that he insists come from and still do come from within.

 

[laserblue]

How are we going to use the Liverpool stuff ?

Un related incidents governed by different bodies

But a good example of different treatment of existing settlements by footballing bodies.

Was anyone at the Premier League involved in the UEFA decision ?

I do like the idea of smearing Liverpool tho

City could 'suggest' that UEFA re-examine Liverpool's failure of FFP in 2015 and their fraudulent offsetting of non-existent stadium development against FFP losses. The question also remains as to why UEFA condoned this by accepting this blatant fraud as completely above board.

 

[The Light Was Yellow Sir]

I know this guy has worked for City in the last and was tasked with gathering info that led to certain refs disappearing from the game after fucking us over. He now says he wont work with us any longer because of security leaks that he insists come from and still do come from within.

I’m just asking a question here but; do you know this guy or have you read on his blog that he says he’s ‘that guy’?

 

[blueinsa]

I’m just asking a question here but; do you know this guy or have you read on his blog that he says he’s ‘that guy’?

No I dont know him mate but have heard from people i would say are reliable that he was paid by City to dig up info on referees as we felt we where being done over and he produced enough evidence that saw a few suddenly retire from the game.

The blog aside i think he makes a living out of working with clubs to provide similar info.

 

[The Light Was Yellow Sir]

No I dont know him mate but have heard from people i would say are reliable that he was paid by City to dig up info on referees as we felt we where being done over and he produced enough evidence that saw a few suddenly retire from the game.

The blog aside i think he makes a living out of working with clubs to provide similar info.

Cheers.

 

[Keeper!]

How are we going to use the Liverpool stuff ?

Un related incidents governed by different bodies

But a good example of different treatment of existing settlements by footballing bodies.

Was anyone at the Premier League involved in the UEFA decision ?

I do like the idea of smearing Liverpool tho

Totally agreed, but at least it shows the dippers in their true light to the wider world.

 

[The perfect fumble]

thanks Kazzydeyna for a mature and reasoned response as opposed to all the crap I’ve received on here for my comment.

I have little knowledge of the law but always felt that if you were in the right then no problem, you win.

It seems, not the case, you need to win by playing games and out manoeuvring your opponent. Why I don’t know.

The main point of my concern is that by appointing a skilled, the best there is lawyer, just maybe, our basic argument of righteousness, regarding no initial defence or simple proof of legitimate funds transfers does not exist at all. We are going to have to fight this on a technicality which, while hopefully winning the case, will not ultimately absolve City from holier than thou innocence.

Sadly our first choice is no longer with us.

"Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain"?

"Brave Hungarian peasant girl who forced King John to sign the pledge at Runnymede and closed the boozers at half past ten"?