Why is it obvious why our appeal failed at the AC stage? Stefan has written on the “wood for the trees” thread that they (the AC members) are generally well thought of
Lovely to see Ed Woodward talking up the "clear" benefits of FFP.
Disagree, illegal actions are exactly that, illegal, no matter whether actioned by a person and/or an organisation.
Failure of process will be part of the case against UEFA but City are saying UEFA totally ignored their 100% proof of where all monies came from, so in very short terms there is no failure of process, there is total disregard for any process and guilt was already decided upon submission of the charge.
Anyhow, back to work, have a good day mate.
The same reason the club said it failed, total disregard for any City evidence and a pre-arranged guilty verdict, IC or AC or AC/DC, the verdict was going to be guilty, perhaps you are correct the AC have a better class of bribe taker...
Further to what you say, we signed up to rules and were told that they were to be interpreted in a particular way. Once we handed in our books UEFA changed its interpretation of said rule. We didn't sign up for that and any **** (Syed) who thinks this is honest practice is a cheat and party to corruption.
That's the one worry I do have.I can accept that was the case in respect of the Invetsigatory Chamber whose spokesman seemed to have pre-judged the matter before he had even received City's evidence but the Adjudicatory Chamber. I cannot believe that they did not consider City's argument.
I am relying on arguments here that people like PB have posted.
It's explained here. I am afraid its lengthy but you can probably skim read it to get the idea.
https://boltfromtheblue.live/2018/11/18/how-uefa-shifted-the-goalposts-to-shaft-man-city/
Mullock and Duncan at it on twitter