I agree about the verbosity etc, very hard work, but still think some specifics in there which, if prove to be true, will be dynamite.
I'm sure I read on here that some info that came out recently was first mentioned on footballisfixed and I've just noticed PB is linking from his twitter to some posts on there.
At the moment we can only speculate about what is going on, or what is about to happen. We have the rather vague information from Wattle, saying a journalist friend tipped him off about a looming story that was unfavourable towards Liverpool. The only additional clue from that was the direct quote "multiple hacking". Whether that means Liverpool hacking us after the earlier settlement, or multiple clubs involved in hacking us, is unclear.
PB then said the media have a story that is seriously damaging to our rivals, but we won't see it yet because lawyers are heavily involved.
Now we have this tweet from PB, which seems to suggest (to me at least) that Pinto is not a lone wolf, but is working on behalf of others.
Is it to far fetched to surmise that City have evidence that Pinto was acting on behalf of, and may have been paid by certain cartel clubs, and those clubs are now seeking injunctions to stop this going to press?