SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 88,243
I don’t think he’s old enough to drink tbh bud and won’t be for a few years.Does part of you wish to meet him for a pint before a match.
I don’t think he’s old enough to drink tbh bud and won’t be for a few years.Does part of you wish to meet him for a pint before a match.
Tolm has been wrong a few times with info.
Lets all just wait for the outcome
Out of interest was that confident mood communicated to you before or after UEFA announced their ‘closed shop’ CL revamp from 2024, complete with a qualifying period that coincides with our proposed 2 year ban? Would be more meaningful obviously if it was the latter
The info isn't wrong. I'm not making the assertion, our owners are.
No shit Sherlock. I am amazed the media hasn't lambasted our lawyers for the amount he is getting.That's what tax is for.
C19 is temporary but it's going to completely wreck football finance.
I am not sure if anyone has mentioned it but indebted clubs like Spurs and Man Utd may have big problems.
I think it's a fine balance. Ideally you want the best person for the job whatever their football allegiance. There have been many examples of "fans" owning and running football clubs and sometimes they make emotional decisions instead of hard-headed business choices. That said I have always thought David Bernstein was one of our best ever leaders.I do wonder about this, used to know a guy who got down to the final 2 for quite a senior role at City a number of years ago. The agency advised him not to play on the fact he was a City season ticket holder as that would go against him. Surely clubs / business would be better suited employing people who had some affinity to the brand (providing they have the requisite skill set to fulfil the role of course)?
No shit Sherlock. I am amazed the media hasn't lambasted our lawyers for the amount he is getting.
Hi tolm, without breaking confidences, there has been a positive upswing presumably due to our owners feeling " more confident " that we are going to avoid the ban.
Has something triggered this increase in optimism or are they just being more bullish than previously ?
Answered in your reply to Exeter Blue I guess ?
Some may want to make it mutually exclusive my info must directly be weighted on the eventual verdict?
However, I wanted to share an extremely positive piece of information that was relayed to me recently - guaranteed in fact.
Without ever doubting the people in question asserting it.
That's all - good news, when all we seem to hear is bad news these days.
Enough for me to want to share, but also enough for me to be very guarded about trying to supply additional info in a bid to fill in certain blanks and put a few more minds at ease.
It goes beyond Soriano and his in-house PR piece.
The reasons for that, I clearly wouldn't know, outside these people in the room.
Please take it in the genuine, sometimes misguided attempt to share what I might be told.
The info is solid, certainly in terms of a reason to feel happy about it.