UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
i guess we can expect a string of stories against us in the media, on the run in to the heavyweight championship fight of the century . I expect the dippers ,scum and Arse PR departments will be working overtime .
Definitely the shit flinging will be a sight to behold as our scum media try to get in the heads of the judges
 
I really hope your right TH but dont forget in the first instance of FFP We were forced to reluctantly accept a reduced punishment.
Several people claimed we would get away with it and we didnt.

You have to remember mate, we did not actually accept a reduced punishment last time, it certainly wasn't on the premise of guilt.

It was purely for cosmetic purposes, a behind-closed doors arrangement between us and Infantino.

It was hoped that it would be sufficient to keep the usual lobbyists off our backs, that's the only mistake we made.

This is now about the immediate viability of the club and the investment made in it by Abu Dhabi.

If you take a step back, which is difficult for all Blues, the questions need to be much more nuanced?

Who stands to lose more, City or Sheikh Mansour?

City would always continue to exist as a football entity, but does anyone really think Sheikh Mansour isn't looking at this with dispassionate optics?

His is a fight for a £3bn investment, which, for most multi-billionaires, means they don't leave anything to chance or surprise.
 
You have to remember mate, we did not actually accept a reduced punishment last time, it certainly wasn't on the premise of guilt.

It was purely for cosmetic purposes, a behind-closed doors arrangement between us and Infantino.

It was hoped that it would be sufficient to keep the usual lobbyists off our backs, that's the only mistake we made.

This is now about the immediate viability of the club and the investment made in it by Abu Dhabi.

If you take a step back, which is difficult for all Blues, the questions need to be much more nuanced?

Who stands to lose more, City or Sheikh Mansour?

City would always continue to exist as a football entity, but does anyone really think Sheikh Mansour isn't looking at this with dispassionate optics?

His is a fight for a £3bn investment, which, for most multi-billionaires, means they don't leave anything to chance or surprise.

Full clip.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.