UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[Newman Noggs]

He answered it.

Not sure why you're butting in but I asked him another question.

 

[Jam Tomorrow]

UEFA are banging City for the period 2012-2016, the original reporting period was 2011-2014.

Even though the dippers have as per usual got away with it, their accounts for the 2012-2016 period were helpfully published in the Liverpool Echo two years ago.

the link is below and it’s eye watering and infuriating what they’ve got away with compared to us especially when we had already reluctantly took a sanction.

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/spo...verpools-finances-fsg-years-assessed-14353937

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Absolutely and unequivocally?

Yep. I even checked with a couple of the others just in case I had misheard and they backed this up. Ceferin apparently said that if we would accept we were guilty of what was described as a "technical accountng breach" we would only suffer a fine.

That does bring into question just how "independent" the Adjudicatory Chamber actually is, if the President can tout deals like that. I also heard from another source however that the G-14 clubs insisted that we get the full 2-season ban. Which just adds to the question about the independence of the CFCB, and even begs the question of whether Ceferin could have ever delivered that deal.

 

[LucahArchie10]

UEFA are banging City for the period 2012-2016, the original reporting period was 2011-2014.

Even though the dippers have as per usual got away with it, their accounts for the 2012-2016 period were helpfully published in the Liverpool Echo two years ago.

the link is below and it’s eye watering and infuriating what they’ve got away with compared to us especially when we had already reluctantly took a sanction.

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/spo...verpools-finances-fsg-years-assessed-14353937

Think they got away with it as not being in the Champions League + they sold them the new stand bullshit as well?

 

[Newman Noggs]

Yep. I even checked with a couple of the others just in case I had misheard and they backed this up. Ceferin apparently said that if we would accept we were guilty of what was described as a "technical accountng breach" we would only suffer a fine.

That does bring into question just how "independent" the Adjudicatory Chamber actually is, if the President can tout deals like that. I also heard from another source however that the G-14 clubs insisted that we get the full 2-season ban. Which just adds to the question about the independence of the CFCB, and even begs the question of whether Ceferin could have ever delivered that deal.

Thank you Colin.

 

[SilverFox2]

Yep. I even checked with a couple of the others just in case I had misheard and they backed this up. Ceferin apparently said that if we would accept we were guilty of what was described as a "technical accountng breach" we would only suffer a fine.

That does bring into question just how "independent" the Adjudicatory Chamber actually is, if the President can tout deals like that. I also heard from another source however that the G-14 clubs insisted that we get the full 2-season ban. Which just adds to the question about the independence of the CFCB, and even begs the question of whether Ceferin could have ever delivered that deal.

Ah PB thanks for that post because I have often wondered how C. could speak for a G14 group that simply decided issues.
Possibly he masquerading as their representative but was trying to initiate his own version of mediation that he would then try to sell to a group hell bent on destroying City.
Unsurprisingly City could not trust this upside down UEFA proposal. having lost confidence.in the whole structure and stability of a high jacked UEFA.

 

[Northblue]

And more and more so with every passing day. PB's latest post only strengthens my thoughts on it, of course if it turns out that CAS agree on the ban then I'm blaming it on PB ;)

Is that the one about the announcement of an announcement announcing the date of the announcement of the verdict?

 

[Robbo]

Yep. I even checked with a couple of the others just in case I had misheard and they backed this up. Ceferin apparently said that if we would accept we were guilty of what was described as a "technical accountng breach" we would only suffer a fine.

That does bring into question just how "independent" the Adjudicatory Chamber actually is, if the President can tout deals like that. I also heard from another source however that the G-14 clubs insisted that we get the full 2-season ban. Which just adds to the question about the independence of the CFCB, and even begs the question of whether Ceferin could have ever delivered that deal.

Can I just ask what might be a dumb question, if we do lose the appeal what happens to the irrefutable evidence?
If City get their PR dept into gear are they able to release this, or parts of it, (subject to confidential aspects of course) to demonstrate/justify their position?

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Can I just ask what might be a dumb question, if we do lose the appeal what happens to the irrefutable evidence?
If City get their PR dept into gear are they able to release this, or parts of it, (subject to confidential aspects of course) to demonstrate/justify their position?

It's actually a very good question. If we lose then I'd say it wasn't really irrefutable. But I think the CAS document that gives the reasoning behind their decision may well give us some clues as to what it was.

 

[Robbo]

It's actually a very good question. If we lose then I'd say it wasn't really irrefutable. But I think the CAS document that gives the reasoning behind their decision may well give us some clues as to what it was.

Thanks. Fingers crossed and let’s see then