Epstein / Prince Andrew / Maxwell

so when are the little black book names being brought in for questioning?

I was shocked at who s in there, anybody who liaised after his first imprisonment deserves to hang.

Seeing as one of those is a Philanthropist spearheading this covid vaccination, its time for results now!
 
I see the Alan (for got last name) lawyer for Epstein has managed to get a load of evidence destroyed. Apparently he wanted it archived but a judge has ordered it destroyed, it contains a lot of names etc
 
mat said:
Dershowitz.

A good man who defended good innocent people like Klaus Von Bulow, OJ Simpson and Donald Trump.

A fine body of men I'm sure we all agree...
Click to expand...

Not an endorsement or indictment of Dershowitz. EVERY individual accused of a crime deserves competent counsel in a court of law. EVERY SINGLE PERSON deserves it.

John Adams, one of leaders of the patriot movement in the Massachusetts Colony, agreed to defend the British soldiers accused in "the Boston Massacre." A British officer approached him to do it because he had heard Adams was a good lawyer. Adams agreed, not because he wanted the soldiers in Boston but because it was the right thing to do in his mind.

Be against Dershowitz for other reasons if you like, but for helping someone accused of a crime receive a fair trial is a poor reason to insult a man. Perhaps you would prefer Soviet show trials in Britain?
 
better dead than red said:
Not an endorsement or indictment of Dershowitz. EVERY individual accused of a crime deserves competent counsel in a court of law. EVERY SINGLE PERSON deserves it.

John Adams, one of leaders of the patriot movement in the Massachusetts Colony, agreed to defend the British soldiers accused in "the Boston Massacre." A British officer approached him to do it because he had heard Adams was a good lawyer. Adams agreed, not because he wanted the soldiers in Boston but because it was the right thing to do in his mind.

Be against Dershowitz for other reasons if you like, but for helping someone accused of a crime receive a fair trial is a poor reason to insult a man. Perhaps you would prefer Soviet show trials in Britain?
Click to expand...

Our government is considering removing trial by jury. Were nearly there.

A passionate defence of the justice system which I agree with. I just think that particular gentlemen only defended affluenza clients who think theyre above the law and act accordingly.
 
mat said:
Our government is considering removing trial by jury. Were nearly there.

A passionate defence of the justice system which I agree with. I just think that particular gentlemen only defended affluenza clients who think theyre above the law and act accordingly.
Click to expand...

Then it seems we are in agreement. I, perhaps, misunderstood your original post.

Dershowitz is an opportunist and likes his name in the media. We agree about that too. That said, if I were a accused of a crime and could afford it, he and a handful of others would be the first names I would telephone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mat
mat said:
Our government is considering removing trial by jury. Were nearly there.
.
Click to expand...
By stealth.
Its scary.
Both Criminal and Family court hearings are going one way...all in the name of the 'killer virus.'
Its a disgrace.'
 
  • Like
Reactions: mat
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.