I think the bit where you said that the fence is not a fence must’ve confused me. Apologies if my comprehension of that line let me down but I can assure you that I haven’t had a drink since Saturday at about 9:30 (pm, I’m not an animal. I watched City with a few and then decided to keep spirits up with a few more).
If the new fence that isn’t a fence is close to (less than half a metre) the existing fence (that I assume is a fence), runs parallel for more than 4 metres and acts as a boundary, albeit in addition to the original boundary, the same rules shall apply. Look it up if you want.
I simply assumed (wrongly it seems) that you would know all about boundaries and borders but clearly not. Maybe the whole conflict thing has been a misinterpretation of boundary laws. I can see how it quickly escalated though if people reacted by typing in bold letters like you did.
I'm not arsed as to whether a bloke has a bevy or not but I was miffed to receive a an arrogant and badly misplaced broadside from someone who had not bothered to read what I'd written.
And I don't accept your mealy mouthed politicians semi-apology because you didn't let yourself down a bit, you had a nasty little pop at someone you didn't know and for no logical reason.
An appropriate apology would have been "Sorry mate, I got confused and made an arse of myself".
Anyhow, I've had my pop back, and I don't come on here to metaphorically arm-wrestle with those looking to argue, so I'm dropping this topic.
Meanwhile, I'll sit and look happily at a situation that proves that "the same rules don't apply everywhere".
My garage, is 300mm from the boundary fence, circa 2.5M high at the gutter and the gutters project out along the edge of the overhanging roof such that it sits above and less than 100mm inside the boundary.
Everywhere I go I see similar and, while various LA's have various twists in their rules, I see it so often that it must be almost universal.