Harry Kane

[whipper]

He's in good company

 

[kun]

Career totals:
Kane: 271 goals in 457 games (0.59 g/g)
Lukaku: 314 goals in 604 games (0.52 g/g)
Haaland: 133 goals in 182 games (0.73 g/g)

 

[cleavers]

Personally I'd take Lukaku instead of Kane

Me too, he already links well with KdB.

 

[skillman]

Career totals:
Kane: 271 goals in 457 games (0.59 g/g)
Lukaku: 314 goals in 604 games (0.52 g/g)
Haaland: 133 goals in 182 games (0.73 g/g)

Haaland really is a freak isn’t he? I’m sure there’s a good reason we’re going for Kane rather than him. Pep preference, money, agent etc.

 

[Gumzy97]

Some of the finishes in here. He’s a world class striker

 

[burnley blue mcfc]

He may score but he’s still a diving cheating tosser

Will be gutted if we sign him,

You’d be “gutted” about us signing the best striker in the prem lg who’d more than likely get 30 goals a season in our team, which also more than likely earns him the first of many titles that he craves & won’t get at spurs

 

[Summerbuzz]

Ahh fuck it, he's worth it for penalties alone.

 

[cleavers]

Ahh fuck it, he's worth it for penalties alone.

If we get some :-)

 

[domalino]

He's in good company View attachment 19788

It's so mad that Kane has only played 22 games worth of minutes less than Aguero.

 

[p.taker]

You’d be “gutted” about us signing the best striker in the prem lg who’d more than likely get 30 goals a season in our team, which also more than likely earns him the first of many titles that he craves & won’t get at spurs

I wonder what other clubs would pay for a sick note like De Bruyne. Maybe 50m up front and 5m more for each season he plays over 30 PL matches? LMAO