Signing Grealish has/had/will have no impact on signing a striker. It has been made very clear on multiple occasions.As others have said, without getting abuse I might add.... I meant poor as in getting grealish when we need to replace aguero, hoping we don't get any long term injuries in that position, what happens then?
It still baffles me that people don't see Zinchenko as a LB, he's perfect for us and the inverted role, with back up of Cancelo, Ake and even Laporte why would we spend 50m on another LB to clog up an already full squadMaybe,just highlighting there is another option rather than spending another 50m.
It is bollocksOh come on. Don't put this up then don't come back with more.
At least give us some clue who it is who or what country he's from?
I think that @abudhabimaxrespect means that no justification is needed rather than the club can just ignore us.What a daft post without us the fans there is no city !
Grealish does at 1st glance look like an un-needed / luxury signing but looking how we've played for the last couple of games it seems that a lack of a striker is no longer a issue for us. I would actually go as far as saying that dropping a player like Kane into our current system wouldn't result in any more goals (maybe even less).As others have said, without getting abuse I might add.... I meant poor as in getting grealish when we need to replace aguero, hoping we don't get any long term injuries in that position, what happens then?
I agree with that. But don't you think to mix it up would be goodGrealish does at 1st glance look like an un-needed / luxury signing but looking how we've played for the last couple of games it seems that a lack of a striker is no longer a issue for us. I would actually go as far as saying that dropping a player like Kane into our current system wouldn't result in any more goals (maybe even less).
I'm really liking our tactics at the moment - we've gone from getting the ball out wide and crossing it in to a "target" man like Kun or Jesus and we've gone back to the "good old days" (in my mind) of short, neat passes to unlock defences - like we did when Merlin was here in his prime... :)
Our current setup relies on quick short passing, and I'm not sure Kane (or any other of the names being mentioned like Haaland etc) would fit somehow?
Grealish does at 1st glance look like an un-needed / luxury signing but looking how we've played for the last couple of games it seems that a lack of a striker is no longer a issue for us. I would actually go as far as saying that dropping a player like Kane into our current system wouldn't result in any more goals (maybe even less).
I'm really liking our tactics at the moment - we've gone from getting the ball out wide and crossing it in to a "target" man like Kun or Jesus and we've gone back to the "good old days" (in my mind) of short, neat passes to unlock defences - like we did when Merlin was here in his prime... :)
Our current setup relies on quick short passing, and I'm not sure Kane (or any other of the names being mentioned like Haaland etc) would fit somehow?
Can you prove that?It is bollocks