Onholiday(somemightsay)
Well-Known Member
What I love about the start of that clip (and indeed that game overall), is that we could have scored 3 times within about a 20 second period.
They couldn't deal with us at all...........
That's an interesting thought. At what point does a brief chat become a discussion ?It's more of a brief chat than a discussion!
Aaaaah, Duncan. The only Rag player who was good enough to play for City but didn't!Have they mentioned Duncan Edwards yet?
It doesn't. The sequence is: brief chat, chat, conversation, and then discussion. And depending on whether the discussion becomes heated we can sometimes add 'fight' to the sequence.That's an interesting thought. At what point does a brief chat become a discussion ?
But surely a discussion is more fact based than a chat, brief or not.It doesn't. The sequence is: brief chat, chat, conversation, and then discussion. And depending on whether the discussion becomes heated we can sometimes add 'fight' to the sequence.
I thought we played better in this game than the 6-1. It was devastating.What I love about the start of that clip (and indeed that game overall), is that we could have scored 3 times within about a 20 second period.
They couldn't deal with us at all...........
That's called a Gorbals discussion.Some people just skip the initial verbals and go directly to the fight....