Liverpool (H) | PL | Post Match Thread

[kev20971]

Its funny with all the pundits (and Liverpool FC)
Pointing at the Wolves away game last season, and how City's goal stood.
Yet just a quick Google, and a video of it on Sky with Micah Richards and another ex-footballer (and other pundits at the time if I remember right) saying how it should be disallowed.
So how can the same pundits now say it's the same as some justification that Liverpool goal should of stood, when most thought it (City's goal) shouldn't of stood ?

 

[tornandfrayed]

If he had let the ball hit him rather than avoid it he could have claimed he did not obstruct the view of the balls original flight path.

Otherwise why duck out of the balls path other than to delay a ball sighting by our long named goalie?

If he stayed upright the ball would have hit him if he ducked the ball would go in the net. I don't know how much clearer "interfering with play" has to be. His movement in an offside position was literally the difference between a goal and no goal.

 

[Sheik Battle and Goal]

What, the very same BBC that cheating, lying politicians, celebrities and every other fucker with a vested interest have told us is a paragon of truth and virtue and the only source of news to be trusted? That BBC?? As Victor Meldrew used to say, "I don't believe it!" And neither do we believe them.

Who knows what Jimmy Saville and Rolf Harris would have thought about it

 

[paulchapo]

To be fair to the victims they have pulled off a blinder with this bullshit, because that's exactly what it is, bullshit. Although we have been given credit for outplaying them in many places in the media and online, this has been overshadowed by the ridiculous notion they were somehow cheated out of getting a result by it. They weren't. They know it and we know it but it feeds their victim mentality and is a crutch for them to lean on and ease their pain.

 

[Father Paul]

If he had let the ball hit him rather than avoid it he could have claimed he did not obstruct the view of the balls original flight path.

Otherwise why duck out of the balls path other than to delay a ball sighting by our long named goalie?

That these dipper wankers have the gaul and temerity to refer this to the authorities speaks volumes greater than the amount of water that flows out of the Misery into the sea. They continually let humanity down and its very sad.

 

[Father Paul]

No I say let it go on & on so they can hurt some more tomorrow & the day after etc etc
Their next game is Forest on the 22nd so we should expect another 10 days of conspiracy, biased opinion & lies
Whatever they do the result ain’t changing they were lucky it wasn’t more than 3 in my opinion

Imo its time to go and give it to the rats next time we visit that shithole they call Glanfield.

 

[StillBluessinceHydeRoad]

Have City had a reply yet to the letter they wrote to Pigmol saying we didn’t accept that Bournemouth had scored a good goal against us because they had fouled Donnarua?

 

[abu13]

If he stayed upright the ball would have hit him if he ducked the ball would go in the net. I don't know how much clearer "interfering with play" has to be. His movement in an offside position was literally the difference between a goal and no goal.

100%, this was my arguement, a player is deemed offside if he interferes with play. zit wss going straight at him and would have hit him if he didnt duck. Therefore his action means he must interfere with play.
They go on about the Wolves goal but Berny was nowhere near the flight of the ball.

 

[Kush45]

 

[malkie]

The BBC article is contradicting Howard Webb’s comments backing the decision. We are now living in a parallel universe where truth has no place.

The BBC appears to be masters of manufacturing the news as opposed to reporting it.

 

[East Level 2]

Every time a redshit team gets turned over there is a stewards inquiry and a coroners court inquest where to next the Court of Justice in The Hague ffs

You ask; "where to next". The answer is PiGMOL HQ where they will ensure suitably sympathetic refereeing for the dippers over the next few months.

 

[northendenton]

You ask; "where to next". The answer is PiGMOL HQ where they will ensure suitably sympathetic refereeing for the dippers over the next few months.

I don't suppose you are far from the truth there EL2

 

[East Level 2]

I don't suppose you are far from the truth there EL2

Well they haven't kicked up a fuss to have the game replayed as they know it would never happen. This is pressurising officials and straight out the GPC's tactics book.

 

[mexico1970]

Amazing how this scouse nonsense is reinvigorating the anti VAR lobby, other teams get fucked over by it (And they weren't) and they are told to just deal with it.

 

[ysmsa]

If he had let the ball hit him rather than avoid it he could have claimed he did not obstruct the view of the balls original flight path.

Otherwise why duck out of the balls path other than to delay a ball sighting by our long named goalie?

If the ball hit him then it probably doesn't go in as it was straight at him.

If it did go in after hitting him then it's called Off Side anway as he was, by a fucking mile.

He stood where he did to impede and obstruct our goalie.

Stupid tactic if the defending team doesn't have someone on the posts.

Amazing how many "neutrals" are moaning about it being the wrong decision. If we scored it no one would care less.

When we scored a similar but actually, quite different goal v Wolves, everyone said it should have been dissallowed, now they say this should have stood!

 

[mad4city]

Amazing how this scouse nonsense is reinvigorating the anti VAR lobby, other teams get fucked over by it (And they weren't) and they are told to just deal with it.

It was ever thus.
About 20 or so years ago, we went out of the Cup (on live telly v Sunderland, if I remember rightly*) due in no small measure to a goal-bound shot hitting a balloon and being kept out... cue hilarity in the media about poor hapless City.
Maybe a year or so later, the same thing happened to the Red Scouse and the same people backed the Anfield Road mob as they went into their usual batshit banshee mode.

Mind you, it seems to work for the tiresome cunts. The squeaky wheel gets the grease and all that.

* or maybe their would-be goal was v Sunderland... I'm sure someone will be kind enough to put me right.

 

[Ashton Moss Messi]

Maybe seen before but ....

from Facebook

 

[BedsBlue68]

Let's not forget the Mane - Ederson incident ! Probably the only time Fungusbum's comment " he could have been killed " would have been appropriate ; and yet the confected outrage at Mane's sending-off from the dippers and their lackies in the Lickspittle Media ( remember dear old Gary Ratface ) was far greater than even their reaction to the Robertson "offside". Strange that every referee has patiently pointed that he was interfering with play and therefore offside but the Scousers ( forever the victims ) still send an official complaint to PIGMOL.

Oh .. and don't mention Heysel ( oh shit..I just have )

I had one on Facebook who wanted me to explain what i meant by victims FC - so I laid it out in detail - he went mental!

 

[Bowyers Sausages]

It was ever thus.
About 20 or so years ago, we went out of the Cup (on live telly v Sunderland, if I remember rightly*) due in no small measure to a goal-bound shot hitting a balloon and being kept out... cue hilarity in the media about poor hapless City.
Maybe a year or so later, the same thing happened to the Red Scouse and the same people backed the Anfield Road mob as they went into their usual batshit banshee mode.

Mind you, it seems to work for the tiresome cunts. The squeaky wheel gets the grease and all that.

* or maybe their would-be goal was v Sunderland... I'm sure someone will be kind enough to put me right.

It was Sheffield United. Sorry to burst..

 

[pride in battle]

Be interesting to know if that has ever happened before in a single passage of play ? Probably in Spain (Barca), Germany (Bayern) or maybe Brazil somewhere like that but has it been done in this country at this level ?

Yes v the Rags