President Trump

Gorton_Tubster said:
He's had his Property searched multiple times been accused of stealing state information, accused of many many things, iv lost count.

This will be no different. The news media that dislike him keep telling us he is in trouble, it's all going to come crashing down. The bbc have just been found out for making things up about him. He's still there. They're lying to you.

I don't like the guy I don't like what he stands for. But I prefer truth to the b*******That's coming from both sides. Both sides
Click to expand...
The BBC didn't "make things up" they edited a long rambling speech which may have exaggerated the point a little, but it wasn't a fucking lie
 
flook said:
The BBC didn't "make things up" they edited a long rambling speech which may have exaggerated the point a little, but it wasn't a fucking lie
Click to expand...
And ? I don't give a shit about how you define lies and exaggeration. It was shit. I know it was, so do most people.

They did that because it is popular, it gets clicks, from people like you probably. It's what you want to hear.

So when Fox news do the same, which they do, is that just exaggeration?

Because I call that bullshit too.
 
Gorton_Tubster said:
And ? I don't give a shit about how you define lies and exaggeration. It was shit. I know it was, so do most people.

They did that because it is popular, it gets clicks, from people like you probably. It's what you want to hear.

So when Fox news do the same, which they do, is that just exaggeration?

Because I call that bullshit too.
Click to expand...
If there’s one group of people more irritating than the Trumpers is the “both sides” merchants.
 
Gorton_Tubster said:
And ? I don't give a shit about how you define lies and exaggeration. It was shit. I know it was, so do most people.

They did that because it is popular, it gets clicks, from people like you probably. It's what you want to hear.

So when Fox news do the same, which they do, is that just exaggeration?

Because I call that bullshit too.
Click to expand...
you're very angry aren't you? A lie is an untruth, just so you're clear. What the beeb said wasn't untrue now was it
 
Last edited:
Gorton_Tubster said:
And ? I don't give a shit about how you define lies and exaggeration. It was shit. I know it was, so do most people.

They did that because it is popular, it gets clicks, from people like you probably. It's what you want to hear.

So when Fox news do the same, which they do, is that just exaggeration?

Because I call that bullshit too.
Click to expand...
Did you call Fox News bullshit proactively anywhere on this thread?
 
TinFoilHat said:
www.mediamatters.org

Megyn Kelly questions whether Jeffrey Epstein's desire for “very young teen types” made him a pedophile

www.mediamatters.org www.mediamatters.org

MAGA testing out a few defences for Trump in case the Weinstein option doesn't work.
Click to expand...
Interesting mental gymnastics where the type of underage (and trafficked) girl Epstein was into is presented as a form of mitigation.

If he wasn’t into 8 year olds, then how can the fact that we was, instead, into 15 year olds, which he acted upon for his own gratification without any regard for the consequences for the recipient, present any form of mitigation?

Like any active abuser of children, he took what he wanted, irrespective of the consequences for their victim.

Does anyone think if he was into 8 year olds he wouldn’t have acted on that impulse because that was the wrong side of the line, whereas active and systemic trafficking of vulnerable teens wasn’t?

Ridiculous line of argument.
 
Would Trump have to testify?

He'd sue but then plead the Fifth so he didn't have to submit to cross-examination...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top