Liverpool Thread | 2025/26

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Vienna_70 said:
Tony 'Skip' Book missed most, if not all, of the first half of the 1969/70 season. To lose the captain for such a long period must have had quite a detrimental effect on the squad,

And we did win the FA Cup in that season
Click to expand...
No; that was in the 68/69 season (April 26th. That following season, we won the League Cup and the ECWC .
 
Vienna_70 said:
Tony 'Skip' Book missed most, if not all, of the first half of the 1968/69 season. To lose the captain for such a long period must have had quite a detrimental effect on the squad,

And we did win the FA Cup in that season
Click to expand...
Seems to have had a detrimental effect - he came back from injury against a very good Chelsea team, and we walloped them 4-1! Inspirational captaincy!
 
Vienna_70 said:
Tony 'Skip' Book missed most, if not all, of the first half of the 1968/69 season. To lose the captain for such a long period must have had quite a detrimental effect on the squad,

And we did win the FA Cup in that season
Click to expand...
In the days where it wasn’t a squad game and there’d only be one sub on the bench each game, it will have made a big difference.
 
Djibrilshairdo said:
Another article on the BBC regarding the greatest injustice to occur in the modern game in the past 2 weeks, the dippers disallowed goal.

Give them another candle and give it a rest FFS.
Click to expand...
Where the panel said it was right for them not to intervene. 3-2 split in favour of the refs. So that's that. Now fuck off crying.
 
Djibrilshairdo said:
Another article on the BBC regarding the greatest injustice to occur in the modern game in the past 2 weeks, the dippers disallowed goal.

Give them another candle and give it a rest FFS.
Click to expand...

Utterly incredible. Days and days after the match has been and gone. Every single weekend, there are fierce controversies among supporters about goals that should have stood which were overrruled, goals which were scored which should never have been allowed, penalties not given when they seem as clear as day, penalties given that are as soft as soft can be.
I repeat, this happens virtually every weekend.

Only Liverpool get this level of arse-licking. Even the two other red clubs don't get it. Makes me vomit.
 
Lovebitesandeveryfing said:
Utterly incredible. Days and days after the match has been and gone. Every single weekend, there are fierce controversies among supporters about goals that should have stood which were overrruled, goals which were scored which should never have been allowed, penalties not given when they seem as clear as day, penalties given that are as soft as soft can be.
I repeat, this happens virtually every weekend.

Only Liverpool get this level of arse-licking. Even the two other red clubs don't get it. Makes me vomit.
Click to expand...
I think Fulham have more justification for the disallowed goal at Chelski ,particularly as it has affected their position in the League.
The decisions theyve had at Anusfield ,particularly with Klopp in charge ,encouraging the Egyptian Tom Daley and Mane to go down was sickening and of course the Dippermedia took no notice.
 
Djibrilshairdo said:
Another article on the BBC regarding the greatest injustice to occur in the modern game in the past 2 weeks, the dippers disallowed goal.

Give them another candle and give it a rest FFS.
Click to expand...
Saw the same and thought 'theyre still going on about it!'. Only one other team get this level of sycophancy. Its ridiculous. Trouble is the refs will do what they did last year and give them everything now. Media job done
 
Djibrilshairdo said:
Another article on the BBC regarding the greatest injustice to occur in the modern game in the past 2 weeks, the dippers disallowed goal.

Give them another candle and give it a rest FFS.
Click to expand...

You mean this? They and their media pals will trumpet this all season - if they finish 10 points off the top this will be blamed for it all lol.

www.bbc.co.uk

Liverpool's disallowed goal at Manchester City causes split in Premier League KMI Panel

The Premier League's KMI Panel votes 3-2 both that Liverpool's goal should have stood on-field, but didn't reach the VAR threshold.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
 
Just read that what the fCUk! The Scot idiot was standing in front of the keeper in an offside position and the ball would have hit him had he not ducked under! How much more of an obstruction do you need! The fcukers don’t seem to know when to give it a rest! Any other team it’s hard luck! What a bunch of moaning intolerable …! I’ll stop there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top