I agree it’s a lot but it’s not my money. I just want to see us compete at the highest level and win everything. I think Nunes at RB is a weakness against the very top players.For 100 big ones? No thanks.
Let’s see how he does against Madrid.
I agree it’s a lot but it’s not my money. I just want to see us compete at the highest level and win everything. I think Nunes at RB is a weakness against the very top players.For 100 big ones? No thanks.
Not for £100m though. Just not justifiable for a right back. He’s no Walker.I’d rather have Livramento all day.
Nunes has improved massively but in big games I really worry about him being RB
Which is where I hope Khusanov can come in. I’m hoping he’ll play against Madrid but Pep not giving him minutes against Sunderland makes me skeptical that’ll happen.I agree it’s a lot but it’s not my money. I just want to see us compete at the highest level and win everything. I think Nunes at RB is a weakness against the very top players.
Let’s see how he does against Madrid.
I’m not sure what’s happening with him.Which is where I hope Khusanov can come in. I’m hoping he’ll play against Madrid but Pep not giving him minutes against Sunderland makes me skeptical that’ll happen.
if we are talking RB from Ligue 1, may i introduce Guéla Doué
Maybe it's a fitness thing.I’m not sure what’s happening with him.
I really want him to play more and him at RB is no different to Ake playing LB. But he’s not even getting CB minutes.
It’s Nunes starting all day long.
65m with Trafford if you believe this. Not sure if that means 65m plus Trafford or 65m and Trafford goes there for x amount.
65m with Trafford if you believe this. Not sure if that means 65m plus Trafford or 65m and Trafford goes there for x amount.
I think he’ll stay in January because we won’t find an appropriate replacement. But would expect him to push to leave in the summer - especially if he misses out on the World Cup squad.Why weaken ourselves in goal? And please don’t anyone mention Ortega or Bettinelli. Trafford is our number two and it stays that way!
To be fair, Kyle Walker was just becoming more than an athletic player with pace at the age Livramento is now. He was not a very good player in the years prior.Not for £100m though. Just not justifiable for a right back. He’s no Walker.
He was the best right back in the league when we bought himTo be fair, Kyle Walker was just becoming more than an athletic player with pace at the age Livramento is now. He was not a very good player in the years prior.
It was because we paid £50m, which I believe was a world record transfer fee for a defender at the time, beating what we paid for Stones the season before and then beaten again by Mendy joining ten days later.He was very good but spurs didn't think they needed him and seemed to think they had equally good backs when he left.
they thought trippier was as good and also had Kyle walker Peters.It was because we paid £50m, which I believe was a world record transfer fee for a defender at the time, beating what we paid for Stones the season before and then beaten again by Mendy joining ten days later.
Come on man.