Pretty much all the regulars have contributed a song now, plus a couple of of 'in-aboot-comers' too so more or less there now for tomorrow.
While we wait, I was reminded recently why 3 listens sometimes for some albums, just can't ever be enough.
Listening to Biffy's Puzzle album, the wife only just clicked that while Folding Stars is sang/told from Simon's point of view, As Dust Dances is told from his mother's. This is after not far off 20 years of listening to the album at various times, knowing it reasonably well, singing the songs out loud at numerous gigs etc.
So what chance then did you guys have with your 3 rushed listens! ;). In fairness, I never did expect people to pick up all the subtleties of it in 3 listens anyway, that would always have been asking too much of anyone. But I did think at least some (fog perhaps) would have noticed how cleverly it is all put together and structured, how rounded it is as an album, how the concept comes full circle, and how the interlude segments add up.
Instead it boilded down to 'sounds like' discussions, and a bit of genre defining, and some tangential spraffing on about the Foo Fighters (who let's face it never wrote anything even remotly close to that profound).
I know it was before posters like belf, B&W and spires who have somewhat different prisms, and it makes me wonder (and not for the first time), what would happen if someone re-nominated an album, how would it be recieved revisited given the passage of time, other albums we had, our own growth and wider context shifts. Anyone else ever questioned that out of interest?
On the other end of that, I have loved hearing what others notice in albums, whether it aligns with something I do or is a new take, or where they see things I don't etc. Just feel, some may never really work on 3 listens. And I may start paying attention to whether simpler plainer albums that don't take acquiring tastes or digestion tend to fair better.
Them's my thoughts of the evening.