You're quite entitled to your opinion mate. I know what I've been told and I can fully understand why people are cynical. But let's look at what we do know:
- The PL Rules require an outcome by, or soon after, the end of the hearing.
- My judge friend confirmed that the panel will have largely formed a view before the hearing started, and should have fully formed a view by the end. So we can be pretty sure that the verdict has been agreed, and a good while ago probably. It doesn't then take 18 months to document it.
- There was a lot of noise around March 2025 that something had happened. Two separate people with UAE-based sources told me that we had won and the PL had come out of it badly. That was probably about the right timescale as well.
- If Levy and Lewis both stepped down as a result of something connected to our case, then it's clear that the outcome must be known in some form (although not published) and that there is some sort of discussion or horse trading going on behind the scenes. Their departures may have been complete coincidence of course, and if they were then that line of reasoning fails.
- Gobshite Brady clearly stood down because of the Sullivan case, so we can rule out her departure being connected to our case.
If people do know (and I believe they do, as I've said) then it's limited to a handful of people such as Khaldoon, Simon Cliff and possibly Soriano & the directors. None of them has any motive to leak, particularly if there is something going on behind the scenes that requires them to keep it quiet. And if the PL have come out of it badly then they've absolutely no motivation to leak.