It's a European week so unlikely (although not impossible) that we'd have been allowed to play, it also rules out Palace.
Then there's the elephant in the room - the mysterious "rule" about playing fixtures in order
There's also the fact that Bournemouth only became an issue when we won the semifinal.
It's just a shit show - but I've said it'll happen repeatedly going forward the way fixtures are piling up
According to Simon Bajkowski of the MEN, we offered to play Palace last week instead of Burnley, which the PL initially agreed to only to change their minds. That would have meant we could have played Burnley on Tuesday, 12 May rather than the following night, which is when we now have to face Palace.
Bajkowski says we also offered to play at Bournemouth three days before the end of the season, so presumably on Thursday, 21 May. There's no reason why that should be an issue given that neither side is playing again until Sunday. I assumed that there's be one PL game on the Tuesday that week and one on the Thursday because Sky would definitely prefer to have them on different nights, but again the PL overrode us.
I get that Palace probably didn't want to play in their only free week in five given the Conference League QFs and SFs, while I assume Bournemouth prefer a 5-day gap ahead of their final fixture. In these unusual circumstances, though, I don't think our requests were unreasonable and the PL's rejection of the above proposals doesn't IMO represent sound, impartial decision-making.
Anyway, it is, as Pep's find of saying, what it is. We have to get on with it so let's not complain. Let's get on with it, win both trophies and stick it up the disgrace that's the PL's management and the pathetic crybaby other clubs who've stuck their noses in, then gone bitching to their pet client journalists.