Henry Nowak murder

The political parties are just pandering to the poor victimised white boys as seen in this thread, who are scared to go out because the po po are out to get them with their woke policies of Caucasian bashing
It's amazing isn't it. Some people think asking questions about a case automatically means you're joining the League of Oppressed White Boys. The internet really does turn everything into a pantomime.
 
The political parties are just pandering to the poor victimised white boys as seen in this thread, who are scared to go out because the po po are out to get them with their woke policies of Caucasian bashing

It's amazing isn't it. Some people think asking questions about a case automatically means you're joining the League of Oppressed White Boys. The internet really does turn everything into a pantomime.
I agree with both your posts, but by basically characterising people you disagree with as thick cunts / racist you shut down any dialogue and are yourselves being used just as much as them to create the polarised internet 'pantomime'.
Once everything is black and white with no shades of grey we lose the ability to debate / discuss and become two baying mobs - Much easier to govern / manipulate.
 
Nobody will bring Henry back but allowing anyone to carry a knife for any reason at all should be banned and should be a criminal offence.
 
Weren’t you in the wait for the enquiry camp last night? What changed?

The family are now known to be known to the police prior to this, in the context of weapon possession allegations. Neighbours are also said to have reported an attack to them at the same time the brother phoned things in. Were the officers told this?

The handcuffing, probably as heinous as the “I don’t think you have” comment also doesn’t appear to be compliant with relevant policy.

Negligence on the part of the police definitely cannot be ruled out.
I based that on what the judge said in his summing up - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Digwa-Final-Sentencing-Remarks.pdf

From Paragraph 27:

"Another consequence of those lies is that the attending police officers honestly believed that there were reasonable grounds for suspecting Henry had committed an offence and arrested him with the consequence he was handcuffed for about a minute before his condition further deteriorated and the arresting officer began CPR. The police were given a convincing but wholly false narrative of the incident. It was dark and Henry was wearing a dark top. The entry damage caused by the knife through it, would not have been obvious. Whilst there was visible blood on Henry, it would not have clearly been seen coming from that wound and the clearly visible facial wound was not lifethreatening. Henry was complaining that he had been stabbed and was struggling to breathe but that would not have necessarily told the officers how serious the situation had become".

The officer in question wasn't on trial. An enquiry is definitely required to establish what lead the officer to make the decisions he made, and whether any amount of training or procedural guidelines would have made a difference in how the situation was handled.
 
I'm no doctor but "stabbed and struggling to breathe" seems pretty serious.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top