Danamy
Well-Known Member
cleavers said:To be honest I'd sooner he had to play against us, that weakens sJoke even more :)paulchapo said:MCFC BOB said:I think the rule should be changed anyway.
As LoveCity rightly pointed out; if Whelan was banned for three games it would not benefit us in any way whatsoever, even though he made the offence against us.
Why not make it so that any retrospective ban results in the particular player missing future games versus the team against which he committed the offence?
How about a 3 game ban and the next time they play us Stoke play without the toerag for the time that was left from when he SHOULD have been sent off?
I was thinking the same :-)