Dethred said:
lancs blue said:
You seem to imply there was something odd about that sequence but it seemed like a logical progression to me.
Mancini's initial aim was to get the defensive side functioning properly as opposed to the sieve it resembled under Hughes. That was the reason for the "negative" tactics and it worked, first we won the FA Cup and then the following season, satisfied that he'd sorted out the defensive part he sent us out to attack more, strengthened by the addition of Aguero, and not only did we have the best defensive record but we scored the most goals too on the way to winning the title.
It was similar when he arrived at Inter, he started by improving the defence and making them hard to beat and then moved on to getting more goals and wins out of the team.
Then, would you concede that we're now more 2010/11-tactics than 2011/12-tactics? 3-5-2... if it didn't fail 95% of the time, he'd use it as often as possible. 3 central defenders, 2 fullbacks that are slightly more attacking, and at least one holding midfielder (two against Everton). That's 6-7 outfield players on defensive duties. That's more defensive than we've ever been, and there are some on here that complain about goals not coming in while also claiming Mancini to be beyond reproach.
I implore anyone still thinking we have a prayer in the CL under Mancini to go and watch the Dortmund Home match again. Mancini goes from 3-5-2, to 4-4-2, and then tries to bring back 3-5-2. The players were visibly confused, and it was chaos. When is the last time you recall ANY manager changing formation twice in a match and completely throw a wrench in the gears. It arguably led to the Dortmund goal, and it was one of many mistakes Mancini made in the CL campaign. He decided to do similar in our must win, yearly jinx/cockup, all-or-nothing match. Its so mind-blowing that I sometimes wonder if he's trying to get the sack and a nice payoff.
Forget Dortmund at home!!!!!!!!!! .....I raise you Ajax away.
That second half was one of the worse piece of management i've ever witnessed. Clichy at CB, standing with his hands on his hips asking our bench where to stand.
Also everyone saw the problem down our left side, 80% of their attack and chances came from it. Once again Gary Neville and even myself noticed it, he did nothing to stop it and Ajax scored from it. Then Neville started the onslaught about Mancini's lack of ability to read matches and he was right.
Ajax at home was shocking, they knocked it about and every player knew what to do. Pass and move, pass and move. It wasn't anything near Dortmunds standard but it left us chasing shadows at times.
Half the time i reckon Mancini just sends the team and relies on them doing the job, there's a huge problem when Tevez is picking the ball up on the halfway line.
Mancini isn't good enough, hard to digest for many. But i'll use the term 'clueless' in a light way. At times he's not got a fucking clue, he can't manage our side to players abilities and most of all which ticks me off is he can't set the team up.
Everton team sheet came out and straight away it was shambolic before it even started, handed them the first half on a plate.
Great manager against Villa, Wigan and Fulham. Can't manage a team when it comes to it being competitive. Don't even mention Chelsea at home, they were shite.
When was the last game we won where the opposition were level par with us, or even better than us in the game? ....good luck, answers on a postage stamp.
Was it Mark Hughes in when it all started and he started to show he wasn't up to it? now we've this Forza Mancini bullshit, it's the same position all over again. Southampton and Everton away this season were both Spurs away under Mark Hughes games.
Thanks for everything Roberto, but it's time to move on to the next step in our phase and up the manager with the squad we have. The foundations are there now, it's just missing a world class tactical manager.
Loyalty and stability means fuck all when you manager is out his depth, and imo mancini is out his depth.