stonerblue
Well-Known Member
Paul Lake's Left Knee said:
In that case they're both right.
How can a player be stood inside the 6 yard box and not be interfering?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Good summary of the ref on MNF
- Thread starter Citysmith
- Start date
In that case they're both right.
How can a player be stood inside the 6 yard box and not be interfering?
birchy1968
Active Member
- Joined
- 3 May 2011
- Messages
- 43
hes obviously interfering with play cos if he doesn't move the ball hits him in the face , and if that would of happened he would of been flagged offside.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Neville had it spot on again last night and to be fair to the man, he normally does.
The ref had a stinker of a game full stop and the offside was just the beginning of his bad day at the office.
The ref had a stinker of a game full stop and the offside was just the beginning of his bad day at the office.
Pigeonho
Well-Known Member
He's been demoted from PL duty this weekend. Lol.blueinsa said:Neville had it spot on again last night and to be fair to the man, he normally does.
The ref had a stinker of a game full stop and the offside was just the beginning of his bad day at the office.
bernabias home shirt
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 14,916
It was a pretty good debate with carragherblueinsa said:Neville had it spot on again last night and to be fair to the man, he normally does.
The ref had a stinker of a game full stop and the offside was just the beginning of his bad day at the office.
Your right though he nailed most of it & went into depth on everything involved when the goal wasn't given.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
The cookie monster said:It was a pretty good debate with carragherblueinsa said:Neville had it spot on again last night and to be fair to the man, he normally does.
The ref had a stinker of a game full stop and the offside was just the beginning of his bad day at the office.
Your right though he nailed most of it & went into depth off everything involved when the goal wasn't given.
My issue with all refs is that they dont apply the laws of the game, they rather interpret them to suit themselves and its that action that causes the controversies.
He fucked up yesterday but instead of admitting it and getting on with it, he then decides to try and even things up, effectively favouring one side over the other and you just cant do that.
2 clear sendings off yet he decides he is going to ignore the laws of the game and not give the correct decisions.
Its cheating full stop and they all do it.
Blue Til Death
Well-Known Member
All the fair and balanced punditry by rat boy will never erase my complete and utter loathing of the horrible rag C**T
Jackson-ctid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jan 2011
- Messages
- 2,124
By the rules of the game, he was clearly offside.
Interfering with an opponent
preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or movements or making a gesture or movement which, in the opinion of the referee, deceives or distracts an opponent.
A goalkeeper does not have time to consciously gauge wether or not a player is offside and part of the play when a shot is coming at them, so Joe Hart's thought process will have been (i) Is this shot going straight into the corner? (ii) Is this shot going to deflect off the player into the other corner?
The fact that he had to evaluate those options before diving for the ball means that the player has interfered, plain and simple. And the rules aren't black and white either ("in the opinion of the referee") meaning that the level of interference is open to interpretation.
Interfering with an opponent
preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or movements or making a gesture or movement which, in the opinion of the referee, deceives or distracts an opponent.
A goalkeeper does not have time to consciously gauge wether or not a player is offside and part of the play when a shot is coming at them, so Joe Hart's thought process will have been (i) Is this shot going straight into the corner? (ii) Is this shot going to deflect off the player into the other corner?
The fact that he had to evaluate those options before diving for the ball means that the player has interfered, plain and simple. And the rules aren't black and white either ("in the opinion of the referee") meaning that the level of interference is open to interpretation.
Pigeonho
Well-Known Member
What a shame.Blue Til Death said:All the fair and balanced punditry by rat boy will never erase my complete and utter loathing of the horrible rag C**T
He's a pleasure to listen to where football is concerned. Rarely gets it wrong and never tries to dismiss clubs he himself may not be too fond of. Stark contrast to his debut, which was a total laughing stock.
Blue Til Death
Well-Known Member
Pigeonho said:What a shame.Blue Til Death said:All the fair and balanced punditry by rat boy will never erase my complete and utter loathing of the horrible rag C**T
He's a pleasure to listen to where football is concerned. Rarely gets it wrong and never tries to dismiss clubs he himself may not be too fond of. Stark contrast to his debut, which was a total laughing stock.
Point taken mate but once dissed forever pissed and he's dissed our club more than I care to recall.. ;-)