Who you supporting ?

[BlueTG]

England obviously, but also Iran.

will be interesting to see who lasts longest.

Good way of making the games interesting (and getting mrs OB to watch the football) each main evening game we'll pick a team to support and eat the food from that country and more importantly drink beer or wine from that country…gives me an excuse to drink daily.

You need a bit of leeway with some of the teams and just get something from the same continent.

Bet you love it when Australia come to the fore, kangaroo bollocks for tea!

 

[OxBlue]

England obviously, but also Iran.

will be interesting to see who lasts longest.

Good way of making the games interesting (and getting mrs OB to watch the football) each main evening game we'll pick a team to support and eat the food from that country and more importantly drink beer or wine from that country…gives me an excuse to drink daily.

You need a bit of leeway with some of the teams and just get something from the same continent.

Bet you love it when Australia come to the fore, kangaroo bollocks for tea!

yep, anything to get rid of the taste of Fosters or XXXX

 

[Damocles]

I'll be supporting England because it's my country and then no-one. This is like saying who would you support in the FA Cup once City gets knocked out. Nobody.

And I'll point out that England have never gone out of the group stages in the entire history of the World Cup and won't do this year either

Wrong England have gone out at the group stages in 1950 , 1954 . and 1958 .

1950 had the old group layout for one winner. 1954 we got to the Quarters so no idea what you mean there. 1958 we went out on goal difference so you've got me on that one.

I'll rephrase:

In the modern World Cup format, England have only once gone out at the group stages. This is the same number of times the Brazilians have done it and 3 times less than the Italians.

We have one of the best World Cup records in the world. The people who think either the Italians or Uruguay will beat us obviously don't watch international football.

 

[aguero93:20]

I'll be supporting England because it's my country and then no-one. This is like saying who would you support in the FA Cup once City gets knocked out. Nobody.

And I'll point out that England have never gone out of the group stages in the entire history of the World Cup and won't do this year either

Wrong England have gone out at the group stages in 1950 , 1954 . and 1958 .

1950 had the old group layout for one winner. 1954 we got to the Quarters so no idea what you mean there. 1958 we went out on goal difference so you've got me on that one.

I'll rephrase:

In the modern World Cup format, England have only once gone out at the group stages. This is the same number of times the Brazilians have done it and 3 times less than the Italians.

We have one of the best World Cup records in the world. The people who think either the Italians or Uruguay will beat us obviously don't watch international football.

Apart from the winning part, although you're still ahead of the Netherlands there and level with quite a few.

 

[bobbyowenquiff]

I will support the team with the most Blues in it for each match. So it could be Argentina, Spain, Belgium, Bosnia, or even England. An Argentina v Spain final would be difficult. How good would it be to see Pablo lift the World Cup?

 

[Damocles]

Wrong England have gone out at the group stages in 1950 , 1954 . and 1958 .

1950 had the old group layout for one winner. 1954 we got to the Quarters so no idea what you mean there. 1958 we went out on goal difference so you've got me on that one.

I'll rephrase:

In the modern World Cup format, England have only once gone out at the group stages. This is the same number of times the Brazilians have done it and 3 times less than the Italians.

We have one of the best World Cup records in the world. The people who think either the Italians or Uruguay will beat us obviously don't watch international football.

Apart from the winning part, although you're still ahead of the Netherlands there and level with quite a few.

We've won it the same amount of times as Spain and France, two other comparable countries in terms of footballing culture and population.

 

[aguero93:20]

1950 had the old group layout for one winner. 1954 we got to the Quarters so no idea what you mean there. 1958 we went out on goal difference so you've got me on that one.

I'll rephrase:

In the modern World Cup format, England have only once gone out at the group stages. This is the same number of times the Brazilians have done it and 3 times less than the Italians.

We have one of the best World Cup records in the world. The people who think either the Italians or Uruguay will beat us obviously don't watch international football.

Apart from the winning part, although you're still ahead of the Netherlands there and level with quite a few.

We've won it the same amount of times as Spain and France, two other comparable countries in terms of footballing culture and population.

That's what I meant :) I honestly don't think England have done too badly overall, probably should have reached more Semi-finals than they have but the disappointment levels are mainly down to media hype. With the World Cup, you'll win it during your golden years if you're very lucky and the rest of the time it's just about getting out of the group and then seeing what happens.
What Brazil and Italy have achieved is just incredible, the Germans too.

 

[Puppet Master Silva]

In order:

Argentina
Spain
Belgium
Bosnia
Brazil

Everyone

France


Ivory Coast

 

[Airbags Optional]

Italy, mums side of the family is Italian, will be supporting them ahead of England actually

 

[afhald]

As long as Brazil, Italy, Spain, Robben or Ribery don´t lift the trophy, anything is okay for me.

How come all this hate to Italy?