Search results

And probably most not on board with the eventual winner.

Jenrick's doing his worst to do precisely that.

Oof.

The Material Victors.

What are Celtic doing in a super league?

I presume he's supporting Trump.

Nah, on the police website. Driving without due care and attention.

Worth listening to it all. Who's stopping doctors going into Gaza? "COGAT". Who's that? "Israel" And she gave a theory as to why so many 5 to 12 year olds are wounded. This seems more plausible as a reason:

The Tribunal rejected that. Just because the witness only mentioned Gulf states clubs doesn't mean he meant only Gulf states clubs.

See yesterday's posts. They set out to do it knowing it was anti-competitive (i.e. to the advantage of some clubs). In other words, cheating.

I don't think any charges relate to the APT Rules. All PSR charges predate the APT Rules, so it's whether the Tribunal ruling of unfair rules (deliberately unfair) taints the origin of the PSR (to target City).

It must be part of our defence that rules we are alleged to have broken were created to ensure we broke them. I'm not sure how an independent panel would regard that if we had technically been in breach. The analogy would be a magistrate asked to give judgment against a motorist with a parking...

PL lawyers: we said the APT rules might be unlawful and you went against our advice. We advise that you should withdraw all but the non-cooperation charges, fine City, then hope they don't appeal. Now we're into wish lists.

If the PL made it easier for clubs competing in Europe we'd have 5 places in the CL.

More like emigrating to the States in the 1860s and accepting the Constitution then finding yourself in a civil war.

The oddest thing is Israelis wondering why they have so many enemies. Next, it will be antisemitism in Dublin.

Sounds right. It's a complex area but declaratory relief allows parties to sort things out, injunctive relief is a court order saying what should be done to remedy the wrong done (to City). Maybe the best thing would be that the bad faith shown by the PL has tainted the PL's standing in...

There is cast iron clarity. City won. The APT rules are unlawful. And if that "by object" means what we think it means, the omission of shareholder interest-free loans was a deliberate choice to favour some clubs. City sought a declaration that the APT rules were unlawful. They are. We won.

Thank you for pointing that out. It also means City's claim for damages will be bigger. Plus those exemplary damages for the PL's misleading response!

Fixed