Search results

I've literally never seen it especially since we've known definitively (if there was any doubt) from the day Everton 1 was announced that appeals of ICs were possible and inevitable. But I only pop on here from time to time.

That is the hierarchy but they don't flow into each other nor consider the same points. But generally the above is correct. Also, I wouldn't always be sure the lawyers can work something out - not successfully. The rules look pretty clear here and like with Leicester, it is very hard to see...

Cheers. It will be no appeals to the outside courts - there was a lot of nonsense spoken about that. It is almost impossible to get to the High Court for the substantive assessment...

Worth my time. Here is the post from 8 Feb (the day of charge I think) - crystal clear. https://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/threads/pl-charge-city-for-alleged-breaches-of-financial-rules.358514/post-15706730 More detail here from 12 March...

Simply a lie. But whatever. If only there was a way to search posts or tweets to find confirmation that I said clubs couldn't appeal an IC... go for it.

I think Coatigan may be referring to the inability to appeal to the High Court. There is no realistic way to appeal substantively to the High Court as I have always said

What discussion. Total rubbish

Not necessarily. Nobody can properly game out what happens if all proven.

4 points off but there was a unique point - the IC found them to have breached a duty of good faith but it wasn’t even something the PL had charged them with so that was unwound by the appeal (probably worth 2 points alone).

At least 3 months. I think probably longer but I’m giving the reporting the benefit of my doubt

On the contrary. I’m certain City will appeal if they lose. It is arbitration (APT) which is almost impossible to appeal.

This is complete nonsense. You have simply misunderstood. Please don’t misquote me. I’ve been very clear how and who can appeal and to where.

No

Yes I often go round creating burners that publicly insult me, support Arsenal, take the time to block the said burner, then get the burner to argue with someone before disabling the burner. No, it’s not me!

I think you can assume Pannick and others have blocked out 2024 for some time - probably since May/June. Won't confirm exact kick off. If the hearing really is 10-12 weeks, skeleton drafting and witness cross examination plans would have been taking a huge amount of time. And of course all of...

Yes

You should assume he was being impartial and he is an experienced arbitrator. But has no business experience at all. He is an academic which may explain a certain approach.

Emails are important. All contemporaneous documents are. But other evidence is also important. This is why it appears the hearing will last TEN weeks. All of that evidence will need to be evaluated.

What if I actually do mean I think you are taking me going on Redmen too seriously? Because that’s what I think. I mean it’s, at worst, neutral in its impact. There isn’t a single person seeing this thumbnail whose view will be changed. There maybe some that watch because of it and learn it...

I don’t really agree with this view but we don’t have to agree