Search results

Sure you should. I'd vote for her over Trump. Under "keeping a malice" in Webster's is a picture of Trump, by the way.

This always so funny to me. "He's clearly incapable of functioning as President." "Okay, you've convinced him; he's stepping down and KH is the nominee." "Wait, wait . . . we didn't mean he was incapable of RUNNING for President, we meant he was incapable of FUNCTIONING as President." "Well...

Well then, let me define two words for you: ****. Ignore.

Why are you lashing out? I simply asked YOU to define it. Why don't you? Seems silly to suggest because I haven't experienced it I can't determine it. What I can't do is downplay someone's experience of it, which I'm not.

I do, hence why I said I know I suck. Actually enjoy a number of tunes on that record. Whilst they'll never be a cultural touchstone for me, you can't deny that on these three records they did ten records' worth of pretty good material. Cotton candy doused in Jim Beam.

I'm far more pedestrian . . . for me its Morning Glory, DYKWIM and Supersonic :( I suck, I know.

Why don't you explain it? I'm a white guy -- I've not had it directed at me. You as you said before aren't. Probably would be helpful in context to discuss your own experiences too.

Many big bands have hits and then "aficionado" songs -- and this seems the latter, same as "Bad" is for U2 (never released as a single, but 2nd only to "One" in fan polls).

Well, I guess it will trounce The Who here then.

If this were a thread on any other English or American sporting institution's fan forum on earth, it wouldn't :)

Rogan is 100% motivated by commercialism. If he were to have Harris on, his audience would want a pig-sticking. I don't think he would provide it, as while I cannot stand him on a wide variety of levels, he's smart enough to know his act is an act and, more important, she knows it is too. As...

Not a tantrum in the least -- just calling out a thoughtless generaliz(s)ation on your part. Do better.

This is 100% bullshit. Once again, it only "seems to be" this way if you actually or tacitly support Trump. Literally no one else thinks this.

A monster battle to open. The best Who song vs. --- yes, yes, I know everyone disagrees -- a good Oasis song. An all-time groundbreaking forever classic vs. a narrower yet still extraordinarily popular classic. The Who without WGFA weakens their output set more than Oasis without SA, which...

As has already been discussed . . . I suspect the thinking of those red-siders (I'd bet who are also large donors and cultists) is if it pays off, great; if not, the short odds can be used to bolster the case that the election was "stolen". Seems pretty obvious the market's being gamed in a way...

You have no idea, I am guessing, because you don't read very much. It's all out there in the public domain -- just takes a little elbow grease and some time. But as you couldn't care less if Trump wins or not, why the fuck would anyone expect you to put any time into any political questions...

Not "over" ELO -- it just expanded what I listened to -- no more "pop" radio; more good old fashioned rock and roll, new wave, punk, etc. :)

Well, the observer in this case IS a bell end. Seems a slippery slope between the two scenarios to me but you’re right that wasn’t the context in this case.

What if she doesn’t choose? What if the observer just decided she was acting like a “race” person? Which is — by the way — what happened in the exchange in question. Or what if I told you to stop acting so “[race]”? Would that be racist? After all, I’m just observing your behavio(u)r and...

Ah. So regardless of what she has said and done, it’s okay for someone who isn’t her to simply declare that she’s acting black or Indian (already racist to make such a designation) to suit the situation. And to criticiz(s)e that “presentation” regardless of her intent or lack thereof. Note the...