Search results

We need a lot of transfers. Right back, left back, two strikers, central midfielder defensive midfielder and an attacking midfielder.. it's going to be one hell of a January transfer window

The PL has stopped us in our tracks by deby us sponsorship and ridiculous charges. As soon as this admin is over we'll be fine again

Was there any amendments to timeframes to evaluating new deals as this was also flagged by the IC?

what on earth are you going on about, £40million max per season compounded and that would be very very extreme

ffs it's still calculations. You are missing the entire point.

I have not misunderstood, what do you think the word "calculations" is in my sentence for. The IC have specifically said that APT rule are unlawful because the shareholder loans aren't included in the calculations. It's there in black and white if you actually read the judgement. Your analogy...

The IC have said it's unfair and unlawful if shareholder loans aren't included in the calculations. That is still the case with this new rules. I have no idea what you're going on about tranfers for

for me, no they're not. They still include the benefit of the shareholder loans in the PSR calculations for the previous two seasons which is unfair for clubs without shareholder loans. Something frowned upon in competition law

unfortunately it is stopping city, that's why we're fighting it. The PL are saying etihad should be worth something stupid like £10 whereas it should be worth £100m a season there or there abouts given Real Madrids sponsership

you do know AI is frequently wrong and hallucinates don't you?

it's literally telling you it's RPT not APT

RPT rules introduced from 2013 not APT, that was in 2021 or 2022 I can't remember which

Is it time for Etihad to sponsor Newcastle and the Saudi Tourism board to sponsor City yet?

they are still illegal as it benefits one set of teams over another there's no getting around this issue

It should be West Ham, Bentford and Spurs voting against to fuck up Arsenal's progress. Whether they are clever enough to see this is another question

they've shit themselves due to the shareholder loans which is exactly why the whole clubs voting for rules is also a load of bullshit

ah bugger, I counted twice on one of them

Totally agree with what he said here. The premier league was introduced to be anti competitive the whole thing needs putting in the bin and controlled by one set rules under the FA with all clubs having a say

Growing confidence then mentions 7 teams could vote against. A load of old bullshit guesswork

correct but the rule is simply, does the manager have a contract or not. There's no mention of exact renumeration is needed or a second contract with a separate company is not allowed. So the mancini stuff is pretty much in the bin from the start. That's before the statute of limitations even...