Search results

Incidentally as a barometer to how far we have progressed as a club - we had 10 players at the World Cup.

I agree that the situation with Mahrez needs resolving. If all it is is a difference in valuation of £60 million and £75 million then surely the clubs would already have agreed to £67.5 million?

I would hope not, although that being said our punt on ignoring FFP while in the championship only cost us ~£3 million which we have already paid.

Yes I agree again. Maybe our investment in property and upgrades to facilities can be offset against other costs to balance the books within FFP rules?

Thank you, just proving that the Mahrez money is not critical to our expansion plans.

No they’re not, but don’t let facts cloud your opinion. If you would like me to indulge you and explain why please feel free to ask. Google and a bit of research yourself will, however prove your point as being invalid.

Agreed but you have to start somewhere, sometime right?

Here’s the link: https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/gallery/leicester-citys-new-training-ground-1719873

We don’t need money, poor little Leicester are really a thing of the past. If you doubt our financial clout go to Talking Balls and go to the new training ground thread. There you will see exactly what we are trying to achieve. Stadium expansion/rebuild plans to follow shortly.

You missed a bit, so i've edited it to read correctly..

As others have said, if Mahrez was a Chelsea or Arsenal player you would have stumped up the asking price.

No, your approach in the last transfer window was at best ‘cheeky’, very late on and perhaps designed to unsettle Mahrez. Even if this wasn’t the intention it was definitely the result. If you were serious about getting him then, might I suggest a bid of £65 million plus would perhaps have got...

Indeed, his snake of an agent insisted he retracted his previously issued transfer request (twice) in order that he receive a payment from Leicester as if his previous two attempts to get a transfer didn’t actually happen (some sort of Ewing in the shower moment). So, he’s clearly not that...

Not factual I’m afraid. Roma never came close to our valuation and were metaphorically laughed at. The price at that point was £50m

I believe he is worth more to us than you and that is obviously factual as we haven't agreed on a fee. In response to relegation - i can't see it - even in my worst nightmare as our squad is easily better than 12 others. We are really looking to push on and break into the top 6, difficult as it...

No offence meant at all. I come in peace not as an argument provoker - particularly as I am somewhat ‘outnumbered’ and arguably on the wrong forum. Clouded by his performances for Engerlaaaand - yes you have a fair and valid point- I 100% concur. I was trying (badly) to compare them out wide...

People comparing Sterling with Mahrez is ridiculas. Mahrez is different class to Sterling and Sterling isn't worthy to clean his boots. Take a look at some highlights of his skill, look at his goals. Look at his assists, then try and find a real comparison to Mahrez as Sterling clearly isn't...

Mahrez retracted his transfer request but still wants to join the same club. I can’t see why we would be happy to ‘pay him to leave’ as he clearly wants and requested it?

There is only ONE flavour - pickled onion.

Maybe we could negotiate on both clubs behalf? How much Monster Munch do you have?