Search results

Isn't that a separate committee? I may be wrong but isn't that when a ref missed something like in football? My point is that if the ref sees something but is not sure because of the angle he puts it on report. Marriner could have done that had this easy rule be introduced.

You are wrong. It wasn't even in his report. In RL the ref has to ask for it to go on report there and then. Not go back days later after watching it on TV. That's like a kid failing an exam then seeing the answers and saying I'll re sit it now!

Of course it could all be very easily sorted. Rugby League, a ref isn't 100% sure so it goes on report. It then gets looked at and a decision is made. Easy. Then the biggest game in the world has been backward for it's entire history.

BUT. Does that now mean unless a game is covered by Sky with numerous cameras the ref only has his view and has to make a decision on that? So we can only have re referring on certain games. It makes a mockery out of the game. The fact is he saw it and you can't go back and re ref it.

That is bang on as well and a great point. You can tell by the players reactions for virtually all flash points. There was nothing from the Wham players.

It never ceases to amaze me that all the so called experts don't use their experience of playing when making comments. Quinny must have had this a thousand times as an example.

We have our own cameras placed all over the stadium in a variety of angles to aid coaching. Maybe one of them helps us?

It is an incident that happens in every game. I accidentally broke a centre back's nose once. He was pulling and trying to get his arm across me. I yanked away using my arms as leverage. Forearm caught him. I didn't intend to hit him but it is a contact sport. Reid spends half his life...

Whatever the result I'm so pleased we are not lying down for once. We have tried the nice guys tactic and all it gets is they shit all over us. Delighted we are fighting the fuckers!

They'd get us out of it!

There is no way on earth it could be deemed frivolous. If they tried that it would leave no doubt that there is something very, very dodgy.

Absolutely! Get the lying fucker to explain himself.

Brilliant. At least give the bastards a hard time!

And there it is. Absolutely spot on. He has lied through his back teeth.

Yes and that is the point. He clearly saw it then claimed he didn't so why are they allowed to review it?

He gave the Sterling one because he knew full well that he docked up the Kolarov one. They always try and even out crap decisions.

Again I ask if they are now allowed to re referee games as I thought that was not allowed. They may have changed that rule.

Easy because he did see it and didn't feel it worthy of anything. Then as you quite rightly said then media got hold and the FA which is ran by a rag director persuaded him to pretend not to have seen it. May I ask why The likes of Fellaini get away with far worse and nothing is ever done?

Spot the ref

Well in that case he really shouldn't be refereeing at that level then. The fact he warned the left back at least twice is further evidence. Are they now allowed to re ref the game then?