Search results

LOL! There's nothing to feel an "outrage" for! She's just an exceedingly bad candidate. So much so, I wonder if the Dems have used her as a patsy to take the blame on a loss! If Tulsi Gabbard can end her original campaign, how's she going to manage against an opponent that doesn't really...

Interesting rant by Stephen A. Smith on the subject. He's an 'Independent', I believe.

Not gonna bother with trying to get the point across on interview power as you don't understand or care how it looks to build that look of confidence and power. That's fine. The poll in the swing states is important to see where the momentum truly lies; it doesn't look great. And, yes, Dana...

Power and confidence is... the first sitting on your own. Next sitting is VP on their own. Third sitting together. Really, what did Walz have to offer sat there? He offered nothing she couldn't have done her own, so why didn't she? Support or 'emotional support' was not necessary and made for...

If you can't see she needed the mettle to have sit down softball interview on her OWN, you don't see how weak she looked. She's on the back foot and isn't doing well in the swing states where there's large Muslim communities. But we'll see, won't we...?

He was the one player that bothered me most! Looks shit, played shit, but got goals when it mattered!

It's shocking, isn't it? To know they've sold their BEST asset!!

10hag: "Okay,let's bring on McTomin.. DOH!" LOL!!

"Marketing her race" is exactly correct. Not sure if Pete Buttigieg trumpeted that he was "a gay man" running for office as a strategy nor the MSM pundits using that as a push for a progressive change in politics to any true herald. Just don't recall it.

Like I said, which you skipped around, as a FIRST interview it was a dumb move. Plus I already pointed out a stronger politician in Clinton (who is... a WOMAN) that didn't need 'help'. But, yeah, keep shufflin those feet on the point made.

The rewriting of history is mindblowing!

"Fairly sure" about a male politician is not a fact, is it? That's just your assumption/ opinion because of your reading of my post. I find her a fairly weak politician underpinned that she dropped out of the original push to be Dem leader and Pres, by not even winning her own State, ffs. It's...

It's a specific rule, this year. They all read the rules and they know what the result is, if you break 'em!

What a moany tw@ Arteta is! Rice kicked the ball from the field of play, off the pitch. If the ball is out of touch and a player kicks it further out of touch, last season, I agree that's a yellow... BUT, this season they have balls around the pitch for quicker play! So, essentially, the out...

Call it misogynistic if you want. I did say it wasn't good to start off that way as I couldn't recall anyone else doing it that way. That included Clinton who you posted above, so you can shove your misogynist remark where the sun don't shine.

One interview with a VP/ running mate at some point? Sure. For me, she shouldn't have started out that way. I don't recall anyone else doing that. If her softball interview is anything to go by, I'd hate to see a debate stage where Trump will interrupt and ask questions off the cuff.

"How billionaires use charity to avoid taxes? Many charitable organizations set up by billionaires are tax-exempt, and charitable donations are tax deductible. You can completely control when to make a donation, and of what size, depending on how much taxable income you have in a given year...

Which one of those used the support in their first interview? You'll have to remind me.

This is such a cop put. It's been a mantra of the DNC since Obama's tenure. But, okay!

Interesting. Finally got a chance to watch the Harris interview. Clear to see her recalling some answers to questions, so I'm gonna say she got some, if not all, ahead of time. Looked weird her having Walz as a crutch/ support person as she had this softball questioning, she almost struggled...