Search results

My memory is not great but I am sure I watched us play at Edgeley Park ( neutral venue ) but I can't remember who against!

I all probability Coutinho wouldn't have took the shot on. In these situations the shot is hit more in anger.

I wish Pep would bring this "invitation" up in one of his press conferences. Basically the sly cunts are asking players to deliberately injure Erling, Absolute scum pundits.

Exactly! It looks to be a foot on front of Coady! This however is why VAR is not entirely factual. Who decides where that red line is?

Is that the official pronounciation?

What I would say is that red line looks well "advanced" shall we say!

The good old institution that is the BBC begs to differ!

She does tick a few boxes though doesn't she!

Perfectly put!

This is exactly what I have been trying to say but some on here don't want to accept that offsides are not "factual" How can you explain that the rashford goal was given but the Isak one was disallowed. Of the 2 the Isak goal seems more legitimate. All this "tolerance" and...

So why wasn't the attacker given the benefit of doubt at anfield? Sorry I think I know the answer!

Correct but isn't the tolerance supposed to favour the attacker when it is marginal? Rashford looks to be more offside than Isak to me.

I am really struggling to accept that this is offside. Especially after the rashford goal that was "onside" last monday. What happened to the tolerance!

Typical Sky questions. Carlos scores a hat-trick - 1st question " did you dive " Vinny should of walked as well that would of stumped the sly twats!

Wow the common sense reply of the night! Could everyone please take note of this - goodnight.

Figure of speech mate as for concussion he wouldn't be the first to play with it! They play with it after a minute on the touchlines these days.

Yes with the stitches and scars for good luck!

One nearly took someones head off , one barely made contact. One was serious fowl play that endangered an opponent one wasn't.

Is the correct answer - what do some fans see?

Apart from the the fact that Haaland barely made contact with the defender. Whereas Mane almost took Ederson's head off! If Haaland had made a serious foul the palce defender would of needed hospital treatment whereas he had no injury whatsoever.