Search results

Yes, the original comment was about the calendar year. So that's what we're discussing.

Instead of the logical explanation that Dribble was inferring he was slow. So to recap, you've made up something Dribble didn't say and then argued against it which is your go to when you either get tired of discussion or realise you've run out of intelligent things to say. Textbook.

Outs base fees in £: Sterling 47.5 Jesus 45 Zinchenko 30 Bazunu 12 Lavia 10.5 Torres 46 Gyabi 5 Porro 7 Muric 2 Itakura 4 Total: 209 Ins base fees in £: Haaland 51 Phillips 42 Ortega 0 Alvarez 14.1 Total: 107.1 So what are you missing that I included? And keep in mind I'm not including...

And yet you clearly still open every post I make.

Alan constantly does this. There's zero room for nuance in discussions with him and once he gets fed up he makes up something you didn't say and argues against it.

Because you're the one disagreeing with me, what the fuck? Look at the list Tolmie posted.

List the in's and out's. You're clearly missing something completely to be this far off.

List the in's and outs.

Firstly, stop looking at TM. Secondly, you probably didn’t count any of U-23 sales when you were looking.

By looking at the players we've sold and their base fees in this calendar year and then also the players we've bought and their base fees in the calendar year. Magic I know.

That's a net spend of just over +100 million for this calendar year so far for anyone keeping track.

207 million pounds in base fees this calendar year so far compared to 107 million in base fees spent. Tidy little year so far.

He's being systematically bullied out of the club. ;)

Andy Naylor, the Brighton writer for The Athletic, is the one to watch on this. You'd think he sat in on board meetings with how strong his sources for Brighton are.

I think this is a reference to a Walt line from Breaking Bad.

Was he on 93.20 or was it the athletic's pod?

I have to admit that blowing the bloody doors off has made it significantly easier to stand by my bed when these ITK posts pop up.

I wasn't questioning their decision. They are clearly after a left back. "A risk" just doesn't begin to describe how idiotic it would be to have just Cancelo and Walker as the players whose main position is fullback.

It's considerably worse than "a risk". It'd be completely moronic.

I’ve read the original post as it was stated. “Most decorated Ukrainian in the PL”. As in, won the most in the Premier League. Obviously Schevchenko was a better player.