Search results

I guess the ref that disallowed Firmino's onside goal the other week didn't get the memo then!

That's because the width of the patch gets wider as you go down the screen (even though its not the case in reality). You need to account for that illusion of width.

Will do.

I explained above why the line has to be proportionately skewed.

It doesn't work like that. The line needs to be proportionately skewed to account for the fact that the grass patch looks thicker at the bottom of the screen than at the top, even though they are of equal width in reality. Notice how off your line looks on the other grass line behind the players?

Can't hurt more than 13/14. I think most of us are thick-skinned now.

No i'm not. Are you?

Yea it's the Sky one. It's what I can see online. Have looked.

Is his foot not a part of his body that he can legally score with and is his foot not the closest to goal? You are wrong but still the one resorting to insults. I understand your frustration tho, you'll be fine.

To be honest, I think most people are sick of the VAR debate every week. Brings more controversy than there was before VAR.

It's FOOTball! surely a foot is a "part of the body you can play with"! Stones foot is clearly the most advanced part of his body and is the point of reference.

Stones foot is on the line and Salah's isn't. Seems clear enough to me. I've seen much closer ones go against us like the Firmino one the other week!

Salah was clearly onside.

Correct. Because it's thinner at the top, the actual line will be slightly closer to the grass line at the top. This is the correct VAR line and Salah was clearly onside.

I have seen this misunderstanding of Scudamore's comments before and I'm not sure why nobody has bothered providing clarification. He said they would rather not have a team run away with the title and would prefer a situation where up until the final match of the season nobody is sure where the...