I don’t see how it’s a win for the PL showing that APT is necessary. I don’t think we were arguing against that as a concept (I may be wrong tho) I thought we were just arguing their APT process is unlawful and it needs a better one. Again, could be very wrong about that
Because I’m ignorant to how this all works, would todays decision against the PL have any bearing/insight into the “115” case will go or is it totally exclusive with minimal to no overlap
Magic Hats tweets are the funniest bit about this whole hearing. He’s acting like he knows more than the very well-paid and highly experienced lawyers on either side
Concussions are very fickle. I’ve seen one concussion keep a hockey player out an entire year and they let players play with torn ACLs and punctured lungs
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.