Search results

Retroactivity is only one of the reasons it won't apply to his kids. The fact that he, Trump, is a citizen. Also means it won't apply to his kids. Even if their Moms were illegals. The issue is when neither parent has legal status but give birth to a kid in America. The kid by 'birthright...

Who's going to tell Victoria Smarty-pants that laws don't get retroactively applied..

You are under the impression we are arguing. We are not. Again, you are hyper focused on the wrong thing. The Georgian Congressman stated they have failed to keep adequate records of their deliberations. You are worried about what evidence convicts or exonerates Trump. However, the Congressman...

Exactly, hence why you should do what you are supposed to do to avoid the appearance of impropriety. It's not like this is some hard work. The damn thing is bloody recorded. Did they run out of tape or something?

No I am not wrong. And this is not about "a matter of law" as you put it. 'Evidence' itself is not what's at issue here. The appropriate claim at issue here is the "preservation of records." Did they or did they NOT fail to preserve records. If they didn't, then why didn't they? You say it's...

Errhhh, no! Don't extrapolate unnecessarily. We know they did not keep some RECORDS. Whether those records constitute EVIDENCE is not for you or I to speculate on. It may or may not be evidence. But whatever it was, they should have kept ALL records and minutes properly so it can be reviewed by...

This is Facts check's version of events. https://www.factcheck.org/2024/10/meme-rehashes-old-false-claim-that-j6-committee-destroyed-evidence/ It should be noted that Factcheck.org it's itself a left leaning organization. Pat attention to the framing. Fact check chose to fact check the...

That's my point. For someone who supposedly lies all the time, a weirdly high amount of his claims turn out to be true.

Weirdly high for someone who apparently lies all the time. But that's besides the point.

Yes, he won't relitigate 2020 elections. Doesn't care too. This has no relationship to whether in his opinion the ,J6 committee were corrupt. Which he thinks they were Both things can be true. The FBI is and independent body that will do its Job. One of those jobs is to investigate crooked...

If you've watched the whole interview, he did not say he wants to throw everyone in the January 6th committee. In jail. Rather he thinks they should be in jail because they were biased and deleted and destroyed 1 year and a half of testimony evidence. Evidence he believes exonerates him. None...

Here we go again. Lol. We've heard similar claims before. The fucker just seems to be so Lucky.

Been seeing lots of short out of context clips - Here's the whole interview. Make your own conclusions.

With far greater talent. It is not the gap that's the issue. It's the paucity of talent.

Nunes

Again, you missed the part of Palmer wanting to go out on loan for a year to prove he was ready for a big role The fuck up is not letting Palmer go. Rather it is forcing a sale rather than allowing a loan. Especially, when loan was Palmer's preference. Wasn't it that they had brought in Doku...

The real fuckup for me is the realization we actually didn't have to sell him. He wanted to go on loan but Pep not being happy with his decision not to take a bit role, demanded he either stay or get sold. That to me is just a Royal fuck up of unacceptable magnitude. It you don't have to sell...

I'm bitter :( And I did not even like him when he was here.

No, we all didn't. Some people did. When you stack up so many young up and coming talent, this outcome was always a possibility.

Not a yellow. But he shouldn't have gotten the first mouthing off